PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ-British Medical Journal
Volume -, Issue -, Pages n160
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2021-03-29
DOI
10.1136/bmj.n160
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
- (2021) Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al. Systematic Reviews
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A Disclosure Form for Work Submitted to Medical Journals: A Proposal From the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
- (2020) Darren B. Taichman et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis
- (2020) Michael Kossmeier et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review
- (2020) Lukas Jud et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adolescents and Adults
- (2020) Roger Chou et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews
- (2020) Zhen Wang et al. PLoS One
- Aspirin and fracture risk: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of observational studies
- (2020) A L Barker et al. BMJ Open
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
- (2020) Mhairi Campbell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews
- (2020) Jian‐Yu E et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial
- (2020) Gerald Gartlehner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study
- (2020) Justin Clark et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Text message reminders for improving sun protection habits: A systematic review
- (2020) Diego Chambergo-Michilot et al. PLoS One
- Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
- (2020) Kieran Shah et al. BMJ Open
- Perioperative interventions for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2020) Peter M Odor et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis
- (2020) Adriani Nikolakopoulou et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments
- (2020) Luke A. McGuinness et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review
- (2020) Mandana Khodashahi Archives of Rheumatology
- Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses
- (2020) Stefan Schandelmaier et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Analysis of articles directly related to randomized trials finds poor protocol availability and inconsistent linking of articles
- (2020) David Sender et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2020) Derek K Chu et al. LANCET
- Association Between Administration of Systemic Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
- (2020) et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
- (2019) Emma F. France et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Crowdsourcing the Citation Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation Study
- (2019) Nassr Nama et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Dealing with missing outcome data in meta‐analysis
- (2019) Dimitris Mavridis et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- The Accuracy of Google Translate for Abstracting Data From Non–English-Language Trials for Systematic Reviews
- (2019) Jeffrey L Jackson et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
- (2019) Siw Waffenschmidt et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Comparison of non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their published protocols: differences occurred frequently but were seldom explained
- (2019) Nadja Koensgen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Quadruple versus triple combination antiretroviral therapies for treatment naive people with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- (2019) Qi Feng et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- (2019) Jonathan A C Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- What effect does functional appliance treatment have on the temporomandibular joint? A systematic review with meta-analysis
- (2019) Karma Shiba Kyburz et al. Progress in Orthodontics
- Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis with a particular focus on subgroups
- (2019) Georg Gelbenegger et al. BMC Medicine
- Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
- (2019) Anthony Chauvin et al. BMC Medicine
- A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews
- (2019) Tianjing Li et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions
- (2019) Nancy Santesso et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Why researchers should share their analytic code
- (2019) Ben Goldacre et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews
- (2019) Fionn Büttner et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
- (2019) Hanna Bomhof-Roordink et al. BMJ Open
- Individual-level behavioural smoking cessation interventions tailored for disadvantaged socioeconomic position: a systematic review and meta-regression
- (2019) Loren Kock et al. Lancet Public Health
- Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review
- (2018) Christopher J. Weir et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
- (2018) Zachary Munn et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
- (2018) Matthew D. F. McInnes et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey
- (2018) Lara A. Kahale et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible
- (2018) Clovis Mariano Faggion et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis
- (2018) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Clinical Trial Participants’ Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing
- (2018) Michelle M. Mello et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
- (2018) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ Open
- Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published inThe BMJandPLOS Medicine
- (2018) Florian Naudet et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published inThe BMJandPLOS Medicine
- (2018) Florian Naudet et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide
- (2018) Iain J. Marshall et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- (2018) José A. López-López et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Outcome reporting bias in trials: a methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
- (2018) Jamie J Kirkham et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
- (2018) Dean Langan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis
- (2018) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Predicting the time needed for environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps
- (2018) Neal R. Haddaway et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration
- (2018) Karla Hemming et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The impact of the peer review of literature search strategies in support of rapid review reports
- (2018) Carolyn Spry et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Features and functioning of Data Abstraction Assistant, a software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews
- (2018) Jens Jap et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review
- (2018) Reid C. Robson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Graphics and statistics for cardiology: designing effective tables for presentation and publication
- (2017) Maarten Boers HEART
- Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence
- (2017) Monica Hultcrantz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A re-evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta-analysis
- (2017) Kenneth Rice et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Do systematic reviews still exclude studies with “no relevant outcome data”?
- (2017) Kerry M Dwan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?
- (2017) David J Fisher et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions
- (2017) Tammy C Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: state of the evidence from a systematic review of randomised trials
- (2017) Daniel E Roth et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Do systematic reviews still exclude studies with “no relevant outcome data”?
- (2017) Kerry M Dwan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?
- (2017) David J Fisher et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions
- (2017) Tammy C Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: state of the evidence from a systematic review of randomised trials
- (2017) Daniel E Roth et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Text mining for search term development in systematic reviewing: A discussion of some methods and challenges
- (2017) Claire Stansfield et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Towards a taxonomy of logic models in systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A priori, staged, and iterative approaches
- (2017) Eva A. Rehfuess et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- The effects of cash transfers and vouchers on the use and quality of maternity care services: A systematic review
- (2017) Benjamin M. Hunter et al. PLoS One
- Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments
- (2016) Nancy Santesso et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described
- (2016) Katharina Felicitas Mueller et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement
- (2016) Jessie McGowan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction
- (2016) Antonia Jelicic Kadic et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration
- (2016) Vivian Welch et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLoS One
- Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis
- (2016) Joanne E. McKenzie et al. RESPIROLOGY
- Comparative assessment of onabotulinumtoxinA and mirabegron for overactive bladder: an indirect treatment comparison
- (2016) Nick Freemantle et al. BMJ Open
- Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study
- (2016) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ Open
- Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey
- (2016) Maram B Hakoum et al. BMJ Open
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- (2016) Mark D. Wilkinson et al. Scientific Data
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
- (2015) Caroline Barnes et al. BMC Medicine
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data
- (2015) Lesley A. Stewart et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update
- (2015) Nancy D. Berkman et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials
- (2015) Iain J Marshall et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
- (2015) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
- (2014) An-Wen Chan et al. LANCET
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Alessandro Liberati ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The Oxford Implementation Index: a new tool for incorporating implementation data into systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- (2013) Paul Montgomery et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosis
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. BMJ Open
- PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
- (2013) Elaine M. Beller et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Methods to convert continuous outcomes into odds ratios of treatment response and numbers needed to treat: meta-epidemiological study
- (2012) Bruno R da Costa et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes
- (2012) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes
- (2012) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis
- (2012) Dimitris Mavridis et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
- (2011) Howard Balshem et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
- (2011) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross-sectional sample
- (2011) Margaret Sampson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis
- (2011) Spyros Konstantopoulos Research Synthesis Methods
- Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practice
- (2010) D. L. Schriger et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
- (2010) David Moher et al. International Journal of Surgery
- Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates
- (2010) Larry V. Hedges et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice
- (2010) Judith Anzures-Cabrera et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry
- (2008) Jaime L. Peters et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now