- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
RESPIROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 626-637
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2016-04-21
DOI
10.1111/resp.12783
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
- (2015) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
- (2014) Kerry Dwan et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials
- (2013) Jelena Savović et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Reporting Characteristics of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Systematic Reviews (SRs)
- (2013) Lucy Turner et al. PLoS One
- Modern statistical methods in respiratory medicine
- (2013) Rory Wolfe et al. RESPIROLOGY
- PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
- (2013) Elaine M. Beller et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- (2012) Rebecca M Turner et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes
- (2012) Gordon H. Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
- (2011) Jonathan Davey et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews
- (2010) Richard D. Riley et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An international registry of systematic-review protocols
- (2010) Alison Booth et al. LANCET
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- (2010) Hilda Bastian et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice
- (2010) Judith Anzures-Cabrera et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
- (2010) Michael Borenstein et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: A simulation study
- (2008) Jan O Friedrich et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry
- (2008) Jaime L. Peters et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis
- (2008) Julian P. T. Higgins et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
- (2008) Lesley Wood et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started