What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
Authors
Keywords
Systematic reviews, Evidence-based healthcare, Question development
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-01-10
DOI
10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Evidence-Based Practice: The Psychology of EBP Implementation
- (2016) Denise M. Rousseau et al. Annual Review of Psychology
- Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?
- (2016) David Moher et al. LANCET
- The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- (2016) JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS MILBANK QUARTERLY
- What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!
- (2016) Achilleas Thoma et al. Aesthetic Surgery Journal
- Protocol-developing meta-ethnography reporting guidelines (eMERGe)
- (2015) E.F. France et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach
- (2015) Zachary Munn et al. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
- The Systematic Review
- (2014) Edoardo Aromataris et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING
- Developing the Review Question and Inclusion Criteria
- (2014) Cindy Stern et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING
- JBIʼs Systematic Reviews
- (2014) Zachary Munn et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING
- PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews
- (2014) Abigail M Methley et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach
- (2014) Zachary Munn et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A methodological systematic review of what’s wrong with meta-ethnography reporting
- (2014) Emma F France et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies
- (2014) R. B. M. de Vries et al. ILAR JOURNAL
- A critique of concept analysis
- (2014) Peter Draper JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
- Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies; Missing Link in Translational Research?
- (2014) Judith van Luijk et al. PLoS One
- Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist
- (2014) Karel G. M. Moons et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors
- (2013) Jill A. Hayden et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide
- (2013) H.M. Vesterinen et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
- Progress in Using Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies to Improve Translational Research
- (2013) C. R. Hooijmans et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review
- (2012) Monika Kastner et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Chapter 12: Systematic Review of Prognostic Tests
- (2012) Thomas S. Rector et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies
- (2011) Marlies Leenaars et al. LABORATORY ANIMALS
- The art and science of knowledge synthesis
- (2010) Andrea C. Tricco et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evidence mapping: illustrating an emerging methodology to improve evidence-based practice in youth mental health
- (2010) Sarah E. Hetrick et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- (2010) Hilda Bastian et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments
- (2009) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now