The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ-British Medical Journal
Volume -, Issue -, Pages n71
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2021-03-29
DOI
10.1136/bmj.n71
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
- (2021) Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al. Systematic Reviews
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
- (2020) Mhairi Campbell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- (2020) Benjamin Speich et al. BMJ Open
- COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology
- (2019) Olaf M. Dekkers et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
- (2019) Emma F. France et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
- (2019) David Blanco et al. BMJ Open
- Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist
- (2019) Xiaoqin Wang et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- (2019) Jonathan A C Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Evaluation of Reproducible Research Practices in Oncology Systematic Reviews With Meta-analyses Referenced by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines
- (2019) Cole Wayant et al. JAMA Oncology
- Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
- (2019) Anthony Chauvin et al. BMC Medicine
- Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA
- (2019) Victoria Leclercq et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines
- (2019) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A consensus-based transparency checklist
- (2019) Balazs Aczel et al. Nature Human Behaviour
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
- (2018) Matthew D. F. McInnes et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions
- (2018) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis
- (2018) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide
- (2018) Iain J. Marshall et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
- (2018) Jessica Gurevitch et al. NATURE
- Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
- (2018) David Moher BMC Medicine
- Graphics and statistics for cardiology: designing effective tables for presentation and publication
- (2017) Maarten Boers HEART
- The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence
- (2017) Monica Hultcrantz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study
- (2016) Riaz Ahmed Agha et al. International Journal of Surgery
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
- (2015) Caroline Barnes et al. BMC Medicine
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data
- (2015) Lesley A. Stewart et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
- (2014) A. Stevens et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Alessandro Liberati ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
- (2013) Nikola Panic et al. PLoS One
- PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
- (2013) Elaine M. Beller et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity
- (2012) Vivian Welch et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
- (2010) Iveta Simera et al. BMC Medicine
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
- (2010) David Moher et al. International Journal of Surgery
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
- (2010) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started