Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
Authors
Keywords
Publication ethics, Peer review, Clinical trials, Drug discovery, Meta-analysis, Questionnaires, Research funding, Scientific publishing
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages e66844
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2013-07-06
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0066844
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Outcome Reporting Among Drug Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2013) Florence T. Bourgeois ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Trial registration in Latin America and the Caribbean’s: study of randomized trials published in 2010
- (2012) Ludovic Reveiz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications
- (2012) Prathap Tharyan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A multivariate meta-analysis approach for reducing the impact of outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews
- (2012) Jamie J. Kirkham et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Retrospective cohort study highlighted outcome reporting bias in UK publicly funded trials
- (2011) Geraldine A. Matthews et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Quality of Registration of Clinical Trials
- (2011) Roderik F. Viergever et al. PLoS One
- Completeness and Changes in Registered Data and Reporting Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials in ICMJE Journals after Trial Registration Policy
- (2011) Mirjana Huić et al. PLoS One
- Two prognostic indicators of the publication rate of clinical studies were available during ethical review
- (2010) Jean Philippe de Jong et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Optimism bias leads to inconclusive results—an empirical study
- (2010) Benjamin Djulbegovic et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting of Methodologic Information on Trial Registries for Quality Assessment: A Study of Trial Records Retrieved from the WHO Search Portal
- (2010) Ludovic Reveiz et al. PLoS One
- Obstacles to researching the researchers: A case study of the ethical challenges of undertaking methodological research investigating the reporting of randomised controlled trials
- (2010) Joanne E McKenzie et al. Trials
- Undisclosed Changes in Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: An Observational Study
- (2009) R. Ewart et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2009) Sylvain Mathieu JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use
- (2009) S. Swaroop Vedula et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs
- (2009) Nicolas Rasmussen et al. Trials
- Clinical research projects at a German medical faculty: follow-up from ethical approval to publication and citation by others
- (2008) A Blumle et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
- (2008) Erick H. Turner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Commentary: Practicing on the Tip of an Information Iceberg? Evidence of Underpublication of Registered Clinical Trials in Oncology
- (2008) S. Ramsey et al. ONCOLOGIST
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started