Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Research Synthesis Methods
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 2-12
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2017-10-23
DOI
10.1002/jrsm.1277
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The European Medicines Agency and Publication of Clinical Study Reports
- (2017) Anna L. Davis et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Use of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Data Repository
- (2017) Sean A. Coady et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established
- (2017) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Outcomes in Cochrane systematic reviews related to wound care: An investigation into prespecification
- (2017) Zhenmi Liu et al. WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION
- Focus on sharing individual patient data distracts from other ways of improving trial transparency
- (2017) Tammy Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
- (2017) Marie Baudard et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
- (2017) Darren B. Taichman et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Focus on sharing individual patient data distracts from other ways of improving trial transparency
- (2017) Tammy Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
- (2017) Marie Baudard et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ClinicalTrials.gov and Drugs@FDA: A Comparison of Results Reporting for New Drug Approval Trials
- (2016) Lisa M. Schwartz et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials
- (2016) Kathy L. Hudson et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data
- (2016) Su Golder et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov — The Final Rule
- (2016) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Data Sharing — Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?
- (2016) Brian L. Strom et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Dependability of results in conference abstracts of randomized controlled trials in ophthalmology and author financial conflicts of interest as a factor associated with full publication
- (2016) Ian J. Saldanha et al. Trials
- Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
- (2016) Su Golder et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
- (2015) Christopher W. Jones et al. BMC Medicine
- Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2015) Monique L. Anderson et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Are manufacturers sharing data as promised?
- (2015) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Are manufacturers sharing data as promised?
- (2015) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Who Has Used Internal Company Documents for Biomedical and Public Health Research and Where Did They Find Them?
- (2014) L. Susan Wieland et al. PLoS One
- Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability
- (2014) Ian J. Saldanha et al. PLoS One
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reports
- (2013) Peter Doshi et al. BMJ Open
- Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings
- (2013) P. Doshi et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- How to access and process FDA drug approval packages for use in research
- (2013) E. H. Turner BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
- (2013) Carolina Riveros et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Effect of a once-daily gastroretentive formulation of gabapentin on the Brief Pain Inventory Scale scores in patients with postherpetic neuralgia
- (2012) M. Sweeney et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN
- Can We Depend on Investigators to Identify and Register Randomized Controlled Trials?
- (2012) Roberta W. Scherer et al. PLoS One
- Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database
- (2012) Erick H. Turner et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Despite Law, Fewer Than One In Eight Completed Studies Of Drugs And Biologics Are Reported On Time On ClinicalTrials.gov
- (2011) Michael R. Law et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key Issues
- (2011) Deborah A. Zarin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process
- (2010) Jamie J. Kirkham et al. PLoS One
- Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label Use
- (2009) S. Swaroop Vedula et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
- (2009) Joseph S. Ross et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor
- (2008) Rebecca J. Mullan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
- (2008) Erick H. Turner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation
- (2008) Kristin Rising et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started