A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Research Synthesis Methods
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2018-08-03
DOI
10.1002/jrsm.1316
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio
- (2018) Dan Jackson et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis
- (2016) Mark C Simmonds et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Hartung-Knapp method is not always conservative compared with fixed-effect meta-analysis
- (2016) Anna Wiksten et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies
- (2016) Dean Langan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies
- (2015) Christian Röver et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice
- (2015) Mark Simmonds et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- An empirical comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in 12 894 meta-analyses
- (2015) Dean Langan et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis
- (2015) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change
- (2014) John E. Cornell et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method
- (2014) Joanna IntHout et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Methods for calculating confidence and credible intervals for the residual between-study variance in random effects meta-regression models
- (2014) Dan Jackson et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Estimation of between-trial variance in sequential meta-analyses: A simulation study
- (2013) Putri W. Novianti et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses
- (2013) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. PLoS One
- Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis
- (2013) Yeojin Chung et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Event Data
- (2012) Dulal K. Bhaumik et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis
- (2012) Andrew L. Rukhin JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY
- Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A comparison between DerSimonian–Laird and restricted maximum likelihood
- (2012) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis
- (2011) Jonathan Davey et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Qstatistics
- (2011) Jack Bowden et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study
- (2010) Evangelos Kontopantelis et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias
- (2010) Masayuki Henmi et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data
- (2010) Theo Stijnen et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search