Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ-British Medical Journal
Volume -, Issue -, Pages l6890
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2020-01-16
DOI
10.1136/bmj.l6890
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
- (2019) Emma F. France et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?
- (2018) Trisha Greenhalgh et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- Improving Conduct and Reporting of Narrative Synthesis of Quantitative Data (ICONS-Quant): protocol for a mixed methods study to develop a reporting guideline
- (2018) Mhairi Campbell et al. BMJ Open
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews
- (2018) Mhairi Campbell et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy
- (2018) Christl A. Donnelly et al. NATURE
- The albatross plot: A novel graphical tool for presenting results of diversely reported studies in a systematic review
- (2017) Sean Harrison et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Towards a taxonomy of logic models in systematic reviews and health technology assessments: A priori, staged, and iterative approaches
- (2017) Eva A. Rehfuess et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
- (2015) G. F. Moore et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
- (2015) G. F. Moore et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
- (2013) Geoff Wong et al. BMC Medicine
- RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
- (2013) Geoff Wong et al. BMC Medicine
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The effect direction plot: visual display of non-standardised effects across multiple outcome domains
- (2012) Hilary J Thomson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews
- (2011) Laurie M. Anderson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
- (2010) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The harvest plot: A method for synthesising evidence about the differential effects of interventions
- (2008) David Ogilvie et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now