Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
Authors
Keywords
Clinical epidemiology, CONSORT statement, Randomized controlled trial, Reporting guidelines, Transparency
Journal
BMC Medicine
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-09-15
DOI
10.1186/s12916-015-0460-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Are Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Improving over Time? A Systematic Review of 284 Articles Published in High-Impact General and Specialized Medical Journals
- (2014) Matthew J. To et al. PLoS One
- Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
- (2014) S. Hopewell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Brief Report: Inadequate Description and Discussion of Enrolled Patient Characteristics and Potential Inter-Study Site Differences in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Survey in Six Rheumatology Journals
- (2014) Sebahattin Yurdakul et al. Arthritis & Rheumatology
- Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Isabelle Boutron et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
- (2013) Gilda Piaggio et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review
- (2013) Laura Clark et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials
- (2013) T. C. Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review
- (2013) Chara Ntala et al. Primary Care Respiratory Journal
- Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
- (2012) Allison Hirst et al. PLoS One
- Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond
- (2012) Douglas G. Altman et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials - update and extension
- (2012) Petra Schiller et al. Trials
- Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals
- (2012) Saurav Ghimire et al. Trials
- Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
- (2012) S. Hopewell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials
- (2012) M. K. Campbell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Improving the reporting of clinical research
- (2009) I. Boutron et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials Published in High-Quality Surgical Journals
- (2009) Sidhartha Sinha et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Sample size calculation for cluster randomized cross-over trials
- (2008) B. Giraudeau et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. Trials
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More