A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal for General Philosophy of Science
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-06-02
DOI
10.1007/s10838-022-09607-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The thin ret(raction) line: biomedical journal responses to incorrect non-targeting nucleotide sequence reagents in human gene knockdown publications
- (2021) Jennifer A. Byrne et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges
- (2021) Chris R Triggle et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Reimagining the peer‐review system for translational health science journals
- (2021) Elise M. Smith CTS-Clinical and Translational Science
- The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation
- (2021) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses
- (2021) Daniele Fanelli et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- The 1-h fraud detection challenge
- (2021) Marcel A. G. van der Heyden NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY
- Detecting anomalous citation groups in journal networks
- (2021) Sadamori Kojaku et al. Scientific Reports
- Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used
- (2021) José Luis Ortega Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- The Cultivation of Social Work Knowledge: Toward a More Robust System of Peer Review
- (2021) Daniel J. Dunleavy Families In Society-The Journal of Contemporary Social Services
- Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness
- (2021) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. LEARNED PUBLISHING
- Rethinking the Value of Author Contribution Statements in Light of How Research Teams Respond to Retractions
- (2021) Line Edslev Andersen et al. Episteme-A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology
- Is the validity, credibility, and reliability of literature indexed in PubMed at risk?
- (2021) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Medical Journal Armed Forces India
- Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin
- (2021) Dongguang Wang et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice
- (2021) Geoff Frampton et al. PLoS One
- Academic in-group bias in the top five economics journals
- (2021) Carmela Lutmar et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Editorial: How to develop a quality research article and avoid a journal desk rejection
- (2021) Yogesh K. Dwivedi et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
- Two disturbing trends about expressions of concern
- (2021) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Medical Journal Armed Forces India
- Are negative reviews, predatory reviewers or failed peer review rewarded at Publons?
- (2020) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
- Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research
- (2020) Jaqueline J Brito et al. GigaScience
- Reasons for citing retracted literature are not straightforward, and solutions are complex
- (2020) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- (2020) William Bülow et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review
- (2020) Frederique Bordignon SCIENTOMETRICS
- COVID-19: a stress test for trust in science
- (2020) The Lancet LANCET
- Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations
- (2020) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Preprints in Medicine: Useful or Harmful?
- (2020) Bruno Bonnechère Frontiers in Medicine
- Correcting the scientific record – A broken system?
- (2020) Mark J. Bolland et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Integrating the history of science into broader discussions of research integrity and fraud
- (2020) Lissa L. Roberts et al. HISTORY OF SCIENCE
- Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review
- (2020) Matthew J. Page et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Reliable novelty: New should not trump true
- (2019) Björn Brembs PLOS BIOLOGY
- PREDIMED trial of Mediterranean diet: retracted, republished, still trusted?
- (2019) Arnav Agarwal et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research
- (2019) Aceil Al-Khatib et al. Biochemia Medica
- Point of View: Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research
- (2019) Mark Yarborough et al. eLife
- Self‐correction prevents withdrawal syndrome
- (2019) Erica Wilfong Boxheimer et al. EMBO JOURNAL
- Corrective factors for author- and journal-based metrics impacted by citations to accommodate for retractions
- (2019) Judit Dobránszki et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Detecting errors that result in retractions
- (2019) Line Edslev Andersen et al. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE
- Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research
- (2019) Andrew Grey et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self‐correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction
- (2019) Colby J. Vorland et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- P value–driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses
- (2019) Luis Furuya-Kanamori et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections
- (2018) Daniele Fanelli et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- Transparency of retracting and replacing articles
- (2018) Tea Marasović et al. LANCET
- Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions
- (2018) Andrew W. Brown et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Citation inflation: the effect of not correcting the scientific literature sufficiently, a case study in the plant sciences
- (2018) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The future(s) of open science
- (2018) Philip Mirowski SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE
- Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience
- (2018) Elisabeth M. Bik et al. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
- Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications
- (2018) Mario Malički et al. Biochemia Medica
- Continued Citation of Retracted Radiation Oncology Literature—Do We Have a Problem?
- (2018) Daniel George Hamilton INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
- Itʼs All How You “Spin” It
- (2017) Mark Turrentine OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections
- (2017) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error
- (2017) Mohammad Hosseini et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Set up a ‘self-retraction’ system for honest errors
- (2016) Daniele Fanelli NATURE
- Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited?
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The natural selection of bad science
- (2016) Paul E. Smaldino et al. Royal Society Open Science
- When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record
- (2015) B. Pulverer EMBO JOURNAL
- Correcting the scientific literature: retraction and republication
- (2015) The Lancet LANCET
- Retracting, Replacing, and Correcting the Literature for Pervasive Error in Which the Results Change but the Underlying Science Is Still Reliable
- (2015) Stephan Heckers et al. JAMA Psychiatry
- Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review
- (2014) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science
- (2013) Susan Feng Lu et al. Scientific Reports
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started