Reimagining the peer‐review system for translational health science journals
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reimagining the peer‐review system for translational health science journals
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CTS-Clinical and Translational Science
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2021-05-09
DOI
10.1111/cts.13050
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Open peer-review platform for COVID-19 preprints
- (2020) Michael A. Johansson et al. NATURE
- Understanding COVID-19 Risks and Vulnerabilities among Black Communities in America: The Lethal Force of Syndemics
- (2020) Tonia Poteat et al. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Prioritisation of Anti‐SARS‐Cov‐2 Drug Repurposing Opportunities Based on Plasma and Target Site Concentrations Derived from their Established Human Pharmacokinetics
- (2020) Usman Arshad et al. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
- COVID-19 and Racial/Ethnic Disparities
- (2020) Monica Webb Hooper et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- The COVID-19 pandemic and research shutdown: staying safe and productive
- (2020) M. Bishr Omary et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19
- (2020) Mandeep R. Mehra et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- An “alarming” and “exceptionally high” rate of COVID-19 retractions?
- (2020) Alison Abritis et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- (2020) Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis
- (2020) Mandeep R Mehra et al. LANCET
- Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research
- (2020) Caroline V. Fry et al. PLoS One
- Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19
- (2020) Renyi Zhang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The pandemic's first major research scandal erupts
- (2020) Kelly Servick et al. SCIENCE
- Open Sharing During COVID-19: CRISPR-Based Detection Tools
- (2020) Jennifer Tsang et al. CRISPR Journal
- COVID-19: Staging of a New Disease
- (2020) Carlos Cordon-Cardo et al. CANCER CELL
- Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic
- (2020) Silvia Gianola et al. PLoS One
- Protective effect of mandatory face masks in the public—relevant variables with likely impact on outcome were not considered
- (2020) Günter Kampf PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Covid-19: US approves emergency use of convalescent plasma despite warnings over lack of evidence
- (2020) Elisabeth Mahase BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Rethinking retractions
- (2018) Jeffrey Brainard SCIENCE
- Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians
- (2017) Matthew Harris et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Unconceived alternatives and conservatism in science: the impact of professionalization, peer-review, and Big Science
- (2015) P. Kyle Stanford SYNTHESE
- Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors' careers
- (2015) Philippe Mongeon et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system
- (2014) Philip F Stahel et al. BMC Medicine
- Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
- (2013) R. Grant Steen et al. PLoS One
- Bias in peer review
- (2012) Carole J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- “Author TBD”: Radical Collaboration in Contemporary Biomedical Research
- (2012) Rebecca Kukla PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature
- (2012) Michael L. Grieneisen et al. PLoS One
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
- (2012) F. C. Fang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
- (2012) Jane Hunter Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
- (2011) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Science publishing: The trouble with retractions
- (2011) Richard Van Noorden NATURE
- Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies
- (2011) Elise Smith et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review
- (2010) Gwendolyn B. Emerson et al. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- (2010) R. G. Steen JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Authorship: why not just toss a coin?
- (2008) Kevin Strange AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started