Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research

Publish or perish: how Central and Eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015

(2017) Martin Grančay et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Will Publons Popularize the Scientific Peer-Review Process?

(2016) David Roy Smith   BIOSCIENCE

What Rights Do Authors Have?

(2016) Aceil Al-Khatib et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

The Rise of Predatory Publishing: How To Avoid Being Scammed

(2016) Sarah M. Ward   WEED SCIENCE

Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication

(2015) Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al.   JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE

Computer science in Eastern Europe 1989-2014: a bibliometric study

(2015) Dalibor Fiala et al.   Aslib Journal of Information Management

Perverse incentives and perverse publishing practices

(2015) Virginia Barbour   Science Bulletin

Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review

(2014) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al.   Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

The Principles of Fair Allocation of Peer-Review: How Much Should a Researcher be Expected to Contribute?

(2014) José G. B. Derraik   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data

(2010) Daniele Fanelli   PLoS One