- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The natural selection of bad science
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages 160384
Publisher
The Royal Society
Online
2016-09-21
DOI
10.1098/rsos.160384
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The ASA's Statement onp-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- (2016) Ronald L. Wasserstein et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- The pressure to publish pushes down quality
- (2016) Daniel Sarewitz NATURE
- Measures of success
- (2016) SCIENCE
- An incentive-based approach for improving data reproducibility
- (2016) Michael Rosenblatt Science Translational Medicine
- If we are all cultural Darwinians what’s the fuss about? Clarifying recent disagreements in the field of cultural evolution
- (2015) Alberto Acerbi et al. BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY
- Offline: What is medicine's 5 sigma?
- (2015) Richard Horton LANCET
- Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth
- (2015) Robert MacCoun et al. NATURE
- The future of the postdoc
- (2015) Kendall Powell NATURE
- Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility
- (2015) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Cooperation and coauthorship in scientific publishing
- (2015) Lucas Wardil et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW E
- Academia’s never-ending selection for productivity
- (2015) François Brischoux et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis
- (2015) Christiaan H Vinkers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis
- (2015) Christiaan H Vinkers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
- (2015) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks
- (2015) A. Clauset et al. Science Advances
- Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery
- (2015) Richard McElreath et al. PLoS One
- The Statistical Crisis in Science
- (2014) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN SCIENTIST
- The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits
- (2014) Paul E. Smaldino BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
- Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change
- (2014) David Sloan Wilson et al. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
- Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce
- (2014) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. PLoS One
- Publication Bias in Psychology: A Diagnosis Based on the Correlation between Effect Size and Sample Size
- (2014) Anton Kühberger et al. PLoS One
- Article Commentary: On the Persistence of Low Power in Psychological Science
- (2014) Ivan Vankov et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- Publish (in a group) or perish (alone): the trend from single- to multi-authorship in biological papers
- (2014) João Carlos Nabout et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How to Make More Published Research True
- (2014) John P. A. Ioannidis PLOS MEDICINE
- The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age
- (2013) Timothy H. Vines et al. CURRENT BIOLOGY
- Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
- (2013) Björn Brembs et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Research accomplishments that are too good to be true
- (2013) John P. A. Ioannidis INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
- Reproducibility: The risks of the replication drive
- (2013) Mina Bissell NATURE
- The missing piece to changing the university culture
- (2013) Maximiliaan Schillebeeckx et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
- (2013) R. Grant Steen et al. PLoS One
- Human cooperation
- (2013) David G. Rand et al. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science
- (2013) Susan Feng Lu et al. Scientific Reports
- The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations
- (2013) Adam Eyre-Walker et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators
- (2013) Emilio Delgado López-Cózar et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Face up to false positives
- (2012) Daniel MacArthur NATURE
- Final Report on Stapel Also Blames Field As a Whole
- (2012) M. Enserink SCIENCE
- An academia beyond quantity: a reply to Loyola et al. and Halme et al.
- (2012) Joern Fischer et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
- (2011) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Education: The PhD factory
- (2011) David Cyranoski et al. NATURE
- Culture evolves
- (2011) A. Whiten et al. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis
- (2010) Christoph Bartneck et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index
- (2010) Peder Olesen Larsen et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction
- (2009) CM Bennett et al. NEUROIMAGE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation