Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections

Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication

(2017) John J. Foxe et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE

Reformatting wastes public funds

(2017) Julian Budd   NATURE

Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture

(2017) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?

(2017) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Publishers: Save Authors’ Time

(2017) Khaled Moustafa   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times

(2017) Emre Sarigöl et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective

(2017) Janine Huisman et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation

(2017) Niccolò Casnici et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Why Participate in Peer Review as a Journal Manuscript Reviewer: What’s in It for You?

(2016) Kristen B. Pytynia   OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY

Journals and funders confront implicit bias in peer review

(2016) G. Pinholster   SCIENCE

What Rights Do Authors Have?

(2016) Aceil Al-Khatib et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

How are Editors Selected, Recruited and Approved?

(2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Countering Cognitive Bias: Tips for Recognizing the Impact of Potential Bias on Research

(2016) Kevin M. Lomangino   Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

If At First You Don't Succeed: The Fate of Manuscripts Rejected byAcademic Emergency Medicine

(2015) William D. Grant et al.   ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: what progress has been made?

(2015) Kathleen Ruff   Environmental Health

Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review

(2014) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al.   Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Flows of Research Manuscripts Among Scientific Journals Reveal Hidden Submission Patterns

(2012) V. Calcagno et al.   SCIENCE

Fate of manuscripts declined by theBritish Journal of Surgery

(2010) B. P. L. Wijnhoven et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY

Rejection Rates for Journals Publishing in the Atmospheric Sciences

(2010) David M. Schultz   BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY

The validity of staff editors’ initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition

(2010) Lutz Bornmann et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals

(2009) J Luty et al.   JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS

Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey

(2009) E Wager et al.   JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS

Fate of Manuscripts Previously Rejected by theAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology: A Follow-Up Analysis: Fig 1.

(2008) R.J. McDonald et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY

So, Why Peer Review?

(2008) D. Scot Malay   Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery

Reinterpreting the fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

(2008) Robert P. Dellavalle et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY

Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

(2008) April W. Armstrong et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY