Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 22-40
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2014-10-02
DOI
10.1080/08989621.2014.899909
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Doing science in the open
- (2015) Michael Nielsen PHYSICS WORLD
- Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities
- (2013) Roger Chun-Man Ho et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Who's Afraid of Peer Review?
- (2013) John Bohannon SCIENCE
- The Shadow of Bias
- (2013) Jonathan M. Chase PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations
- (2013) Adam Eyre-Walker et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing
- (2013) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Frontiers in Plant Science
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
- (2012) Christopher D. Chambers CORTEX
- Information Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice
- (2012) Lynn S. McCarty et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05
- (2012) E.J. Masicampo et al. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
- The ethics of collaborative authorship
- (2011) Jaime A Teixeira da Silva EMBO REPORTS
- Inferring synaptic inputs given a noisy voltage trace via sequential Monte Carlo methods
- (2011) Liam Paninski et al. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Accessible Reproducible Research
- (2010) J. P. Mesirov SCIENCE
- Enhancing the Credibility of Decisions Based on Scientific Conclusions: Transparency Is Imperative
- (2010) Jay Schreider et al. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Reproducible research in signal processing
- (2009) Patrick Vandewalle et al. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE
- The Legal Framework for Reproducible Scientific Research: Licensing and Copyright
- (2008) Victoria Stodden COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
- Duplicate publication and ‘salami slicing’: Ethical issues and practical solutions
- (2008) Ian Norman et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started