Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior
Authors
Keywords
Accountability, Anonymity, Errors in the literature, PPPR, Publons, PubMed Commons, PubPeer, Responsibility, Status quo
Journal
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 1213-1226
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s11948-016-9854-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?
- (2017) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers
- (2016) Armen Yuri Gasparyan et al. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
- The impact of fraudulent and irreproducible data to the translational research crisis - solutions and implementation
- (2016) Jörg B. Schulz et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
- The challenges for scientific publishing, 60 years on
- (2016) Laura Hausmann et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
- Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors
- (2016) David B. Allison et al. NATURE
- Stop ignoring misconduct
- (2016) Donald S. Kornfeld et al. NATURE
- Does the Anonymous Voice Have a Place in Scholarly Publishing?
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
- The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
- (2016) Michail Kovanis et al. PLoS One
- Due process in the Twitter age
- (2016) M. McNutt SCIENCE
- Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Science Is Not Always “Self-Correcting”
- (2015) Nathan Cofnas Foundations of Science
- Reviewing post-publication peer review
- (2015) Paul Knoepfler TRENDS IN GENETICS
- Emerging trends in peer review—a survey
- (2015) Richard Walker et al. Frontiers in Neuroscience
- The Importance of the Anonymous Voice in Postpublication Peer Review
- (2015) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Redrawing the frontiers in the age of post-publication review
- (2015) David W. Galbraith Frontiers in Genetics
- Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review
- (2014) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
- (2014) Jigisha Patel BMC Medicine
- Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system
- (2014) Philip F Stahel et al. BMC Medicine
- Publishing: The peer-review scam
- (2014) Cat Ferguson et al. NATURE
- A Stronger Post-Publication Culture Is Needed for Better Science
- (2014) Hilda Bastian PLOS MEDICINE
- Anonymity in science
- (2013) Neuroskeptic TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
- Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- (2013) Joseph Ana et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
- (2012) Răzvan V. Florian Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing
- (2012) Nikolaus Kriegeskorte et al. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network
- (2012) Christopher Lee Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
- (2012) Jane Hunter Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Decoupling the scholarly journal
- (2012) Jason Priem et al. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Toward a New Model of Scientific Publishing: Discussion and a Proposal
- (2011) Dwight J. Kravitz et al. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started