Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Classification and analysis of
PubPeer
comments: How a web journal club is used
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2021-08-24
DOI
10.1002/asi.24568
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019
- (2021) Mario Malički et al. Biochemia Medica
- Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers
- (2020) Helen Shen NATURE
- Self-correction of science: a comparative study of negative citations and post-publication peer review
- (2020) Frederique Bordignon SCIENTOMETRICS
- Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
- (2018) Elizabeth L. Pier et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Conflict of Interest in Journal Peer Review
- (2018) David B. Resnik et al. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
- Challenges to open peer review
- (2018) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- New Classification of Research Misconduct from the Viewpoint of Truth, Trust, and Risk
- (2018) Toshio Kuroki Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications
- (2018) S. P. J. M. Horbach et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Exploratory analysis of Publons metrics and their relationship with bibliometric and altmetric impact
- (2018) Jose Luis Ortega Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Are peer-review activities related to reviewer bibliometric performance? A scientometric analysis of Publons
- (2017) José Luis Ortega SCIENTOMETRICS
- Difficulty of recruiting reviewers predicts review scores and editorial decisions at six journals of ecology and evolution
- (2017) Charles W. Fox SCIENTOMETRICS
- Gender bias in scholarly peer review
- (2017) Markus Helmer et al. eLife
- Misconduct versus Honest Error and Scientific Disagreement
- (2017) David B. Resnik et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics
- (2016) Mohammad Salehan et al. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
- Does the Anonymous Voice Have a Place in Scholarly Publishing?
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
- Transparent peer review one year on
- (2016) Nature Communications
- Vigilante Science
- (2015) Michael R. Blatt PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
- Incidence of Data Duplications in a Randomly Selected Pool of Life Science Publications
- (2015) Morten P. Oksvold SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Reviewing post-publication peer review
- (2015) Paul Knoepfler TRENDS IN GENETICS
- Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review
- (2014) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle
- (2013) Ed Yong et al. NATURE
- The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
- (2013) Bo-Christer Björk et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Sentiment strength detection for the social web
- (2011) Mike Thelwall et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now