JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESS ENGINEERING
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESS ENGINEERING
J FOOD PROCESS ENG
ISSN / eISSN
0145-8876 / 1745-4530
Subject Area
ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category | Quartile | Rank |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - Food Science | Q2 | #98/359 |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - General Chemical Engineering | Q2 | #87/272 |
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
---|---|
Indexed | - |
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
---|---|
ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL - SCIE | Q3 |
FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY - SCIE | Q3 |
H-index
40
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Year Publication Started
1977
Annual Article Volume
291
Open Access
NO
Contact
WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC, COMMERCE PLACE, 350 MAIN ST, MALDEN, USA, MA, 02148
Verified Reviews
9.26 Major revision, 4 reviewers. Reviewer 1 (R1) mentioned that there were language issues and the paper needed significant revisions. R1 listed 19 unclear or incorrect statements. R2 mentioned that there was too much speculation in the conclusion and uncertainty. R3 pointed out a lack of citations in a certain area. R4 simply summarized what I had done without providing any comments.
10.19 Submitted revised manuscript, making changes and improvements based on R1's suggestions. Responded to R2 stating that there is limited literature in this niche field, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions. Additionally, mentioned that the article was submitted as research notes, presenting preliminary data, and further experiments are ongoing. Responded to R3, acknowledging the addition of appropriate citations. Thanked R4 for their summary.
10.31 Major revision, R1 persisted, stating that although there was improvement in language, it still did not meet publishing standards. Certain terminology was not used correctly, and the answer to a previously mentioned issue was unsatisfactory. R2 mentioned that the author made serious revisions and had no further comments. R3 and R4 did not provide any comments.
11.04 Submitted revised manuscript, carefully reviewing the areas with non-standard terminology and providing a new explanation for the issue that R1 was unsatisfied with. Further proofread the entire paper.
11.18 Accepted. R1 stated that it is now satisfactory and congratulated. R2's comment was identical to the previous one.
9.30 Minor revisions
10.27 Submission of minor revisions
11.07 Major revisions, deadline until 2023.1.7
11.20 Return after major revisions
11.21 Initial review editing completed and sent for external review
11.24 Reviewer's comments received
11.25 Awaiting Editor-in-Chief's decision
2022.12.02 Accepted
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started