Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework
Authors
Keywords
Risk perception, Benefit perception, Attitude towards nanotechnology, Nanotechnology acceptance, Societal implications
Journal
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-01-25
DOI
10.1007/s11051-016-3733-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnology in food products: an attribute-based analysis
- (2016) Nigel D. Steenis et al. British Food Journal
- Genetically Modified (GM) Foods and Ethical Eating
- (2015) Francis Dizon et al. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
- Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-food
- (2015) Chengyan Yue et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review
- (2015) Emma L. Giles et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Regulatory aspects of nanotechnology in the agri/feed/food sector in EU and non-EU countries
- (2015) Valeria Amenta et al. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
- Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops
- (2015) Jan Lucht Viruses-Basel
- Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance
- (2015) N. Gupta et al. NanoEthics
- Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formation toward Familiar and Unfamiliar Attitude Objects
- (2015) Roxanne I. van Giesen et al. PLoS One
- Using a Deliberative Exercise To Foster Public Engagement in Nanotechnology
- (2014) Angela R. Jones et al. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
- Awareness on adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among public: survey study from Singapore
- (2014) Saji George et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators
- (2014) Anthony Dudo et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Expert views on societal responses to different applications of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of experts in countries with different economic and regulatory environments
- (2013) Nidhi Gupta et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: convergence of knowledge, technology, and society
- (2013) Mihail C. Roco et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Global nanotechnology development from 1991 to 2012: patents, scientific publications, and effect of NSF funding
- (2013) Hsinchun Chen et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Expert Views on Regulatory Preparedness for Managing the Risks of Nanotechnologies
- (2013) Christian E. H. Beaudrie et al. PLoS One
- Imagination Difficulty and New Product Evaluation
- (2012) Min Zhao et al. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
- Comparing nanoparticle risk perceptions to other known EHS risks
- (2011) David M. Berube et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies–converging societal response research?
- (2011) Amber Ronteltap et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science
- (2011) Andrea Retzbach et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework
- (2011) N.M.A. Huijts et al. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
- Evidence Maps: Communicating Risk Assessments in Societal Controversies: The Case of Engineered Nanoparticles
- (2011) Peter Wiedemann et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Making sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology
- (2010) Shirley S. Ho et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- The Effectiveness of Risk Management: An Analysis of Project Risk Planning Across Industries and Countries
- (2010) Ofer Zwikael et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology
- (2009) Johannes Simons et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- The morality of attitudes toward nanotechnology: about God, techno-scientific progress, and interfering with nature
- (2009) Frederic Vandermoere et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies
- (2009) Terre Satterfield et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging
- (2008) Michael Siegrist et al. APPETITE
- Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology
- (2008) Dan M. Kahan et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom
- (2008) Nick Pidgeon et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States
- (2008) Dietram A. Scheufele et al. Nature Nanotechnology
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started