Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance
Authors
Keywords
Ethical concern, Expert-lay comparison, Nanotechnology, Consumer perception, Repertory grid method, Societal acceptance
Journal
NanoEthics
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 93-108
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-04-23
DOI
10.1007/s11569-015-0222-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Risk Ranking: Investigating Expert and Public Differences in Evaluating Food Safety Hazards
- (2016) KEVIN WEBSTER et al. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
- Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production
- (2014) L.J. Frewer et al. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
- Nanotechnology applied to European food production – A review of ethical and regulatory issues
- (2013) D. Coles et al. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
- Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) Lynn J. Frewer et al. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
- Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis
- (2012) Nidhi Gupta et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Nanotechnology as an experiment in democracy: how do citizens form opinions about technology and policy?
- (2011) Susanna Hornig Priest et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Nanotechnology in the public eye: the case of Iran, as a developing country
- (2011) Parvin Farshchi et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies–converging societal response research?
- (2011) Amber Ronteltap et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Public understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science
- (2011) Andrea Retzbach et al. JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
- Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent U.S. Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions
- (2011) Joseph Conti et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies
- (2011) L.J. Frewer et al. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
- Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies
- (2009) Terre Satterfield et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Identifying the Values and Preferences of Prosthetic Users: A Case Study Series Using the Repertory Grid Technique
- (2009) Elisabeth Schaffalitzky et al. PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL
- Why Do We Need to Know What the Public Thinks about Nanotechnology?
- (2009) Craig Cormick NanoEthics
- Consumers’ willingness to buy functional foods. The influence of carrier, benefit and trust
- (2008) Michael Siegrist et al. APPETITE
- Older people's perceptions towards conventional and functional yoghurts through the repertory grid method
- (2008) Federico Messina et al. British Food Journal
- Americans' Nanotechnology Risk Perception:
- (2008) Sara E. Smiley Smith et al. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
- Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom
- (2008) Nick Pidgeon et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States
- (2008) Dietram A. Scheufele et al. Nature Nanotechnology
- Avoiding Empty Rhetoric: Engaging Publics in Debates About Nanotechnologies
- (2008) Renee Kyle et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More