An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
eLife
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
Online
2021-10-19
DOI
10.7554/elife.71368
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Fund Black scientists
- (2021) Kelly R. Stevens et al. CELL
- Equity, Diversity and Inclusion: Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health
- (2021) Michael A Taffe et al. eLife
- Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts
- (2021) Mathias Wullum Nielsen et al. eLife
- Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health
- (2021) Michael S Lauer et al. eLife
- NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores
- (2020) Elena A. Erosheva et al. Science Advances
- Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
- (2019) Charles W. Fox et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review
- (2019) Samir Haffar et al. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
- Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency
- (2019) Holly O Witteman et al. LANCET
- The cases for and against double-blind reviews
- (2019) Amelia R. Cox et al. PeerJ
- Opinion: The National Institutes of Health needs to better balance funding distributions among US institutions
- (2019) Wayne P. Wahls PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers
- (2019) Weihua Li et al. Nature Communications
- Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists
- (2019) Travis A. Hoppe et al. Science Advances
- Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals
- (2018) Michael H. K. Bendels et al. PLoS One
- Sex Disparities in Authorship Order of Cardiology Scientific Publications
- (2018) David Ouyang et al.
- Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards
- (2018) Donna K. Ginther et al. PLoS One
- Journals invite too few women to referee
- (2017) Jory Lerback et al. NATURE
- Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards
- (2016) Donna K. Ginther et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige
- (2016) Kanu Okike et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
- (2016) Iman Tahamtan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities
- (2016) Dennis L. Murray et al. PLoS One
- Reputation and impact in academic careers
- (2014) A. M. Petersen et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender
- (2014) Anna Kaatz et al. TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Unpacking the Matthew effect in citations
- (2014) Jian Wang Journal of Informetrics
- A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing
- (2013) Fredrik Niclas Piro et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Disparities in publication patterns by gender, race and ethnicity based on a survey of a random sample of authors
- (2012) Allison L. Hopkins et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs
- (2011) Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards
- (2011) D. K. Ginther et al. SCIENCE
- Do gender, nationality, or academic age affect review decisions? An analysis of submissions to the journal Biological Conservation
- (2009) Richard B. Primack et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model
- (2008) Andrew C. Leon et al. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS
- Journal review and gender equality: a critical comment on Budden et al.
- (2008) R WHITTAKER TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors
- (2007) A BUDDEN et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now