Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 3599-3619
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-03-04
DOI
10.1002/ece3.4993
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Double-blind peer review-An experiment
- (2019) Charles W. Fox et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency
- (2019) Holly O Witteman et al. LANCET
- Don’t judge me: Psychophysiological evidence of gender differences to social evaluative feedback
- (2018) Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt et al. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
- Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals
- (2018) Michael H. K. Bendels et al. PLoS One
- Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal
- (2018) Hannah A. Edwards et al. PLoS One
- The effectiveness of journals as arbiters of scientific impact
- (2018) C. E. Timothy Paine et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography
- (2018) Charles W. Fox et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Journals invite too few women to referee
- (2017) Jory Lerback et al. NATURE
- Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
- (2017) Andrew Tomkins et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Gender comparisons of social work faculty using H-Index scores
- (2017) T. Edison Carter et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology
- (2017) Meghan A. Duffy Ecology and Evolution
- Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores
- (2016) Anna Kaatz et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Solving the Productivity and Impact Puzzle: Do Men Outperform Women, or are Metrics Biased?
- (2016) Elissa Z. Cameron et al. BIOSCIENCE
- Author-suggested reviewers: gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal
- (2016) Charles W. Fox et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
- (2016) Iman Tahamtan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender
- (2016) Xiao Han T. Zeng et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- An Examination of Gender Differences in the American Fisheries Society Peer-Review Process
- (2015) Grace Handley et al. FISHERIES
- Gender differences in patterns of authorship do not affect peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
- (2015) Charles W. Fox et al. FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
- Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?
- (2015) D. Li et al. SCIENCE
- The relationship between manuscript title structure and success: editorial decisions and citation performance for an ecological journal
- (2015) Charles W. Fox et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Attrition of Women in the Biological Sciences: Workload, Motherhood, and Other Explanations Revisited
- (2013) BIOSCIENCE
- Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science
- (2013) Vincent Larivière et al. NATURE
- Bias in peer review
- (2012) Carole J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students
- (2012) C. A. Moss-Racusin et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Author self-citations in the field of ecology
- (2011) Mathieu Leblond SCIENTOMETRICS
- Gender aspects in medical publication – the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
- (2010) Andrea Heckenberg et al. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT
- Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: A substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model
- (2010) Herbert W. Marsh et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Do gender, nationality, or academic age affect review decisions? An analysis of submissions to the journal Biological Conservation
- (2009) Richard B. Primack et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Is There Gender Bias in the Peer Review Process at Journal of Neurophysiology?
- (2009) John A. Lane et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
- Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity
- (2009) Martin Reinhart SCIENTOMETRICS
- SOCIOLOGY: The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications
- (2008) T. J. Ley et al. SCIENCE
- The h-index and self-citations
- (2008) Leif Engqvist et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now