An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes

Fund Black scientists

(2021) Kelly R. Stevens et al.   CELL

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion: Racial inequity in grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health

(2021) Michael A Taffe et al.   eLife

Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts

(2021) Mathias Wullum Nielsen et al.   eLife

Associations of topic-specific peer review outcomes and institute and center award rates with funding disparities at the National Institutes of Health

(2021) Michael S Lauer et al.   eLife

NIH peer review: Criterion scores completely account for racial disparities in overall impact scores

(2020) Elena A. Erosheva et al.   Science Advances

Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution

(2019) Charles W. Fox et al.   Ecology and Evolution

Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review

(2019) Samir Haffar et al.   MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS

Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency

(2019) Holly O Witteman et al.   LANCET

The cases for and against double-blind reviews

(2019) Amelia R. Cox et al.   PeerJ

Opinion: The National Institutes of Health needs to better balance funding distributions among US institutions

(2019) Wayne P. Wahls   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers

(2019) Weihua Li et al.   Nature Communications

Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists

(2019) Travis A. Hoppe et al.   Science Advances

Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals

(2018) Michael H. K. Bendels et al.   PLoS One

Sex Disparities in Authorship Order of Cardiology Scientific Publications

(2018) David Ouyang et al.  

Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards

(2018) Donna K. Ginther et al.   PLoS One

Journals invite too few women to referee

(2017) Jory Lerback et al.   NATURE

Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards

(2016) Donna K. Ginther et al.   ACADEMIC MEDICINE

Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige

(2016) Kanu Okike et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature

(2016) Iman Tahamtan et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Bias in Research Grant Evaluation Has Dire Consequences for Small Universities

(2016) Dennis L. Murray et al.   PLoS One

Reputation and impact in academic careers

(2014) A. M. Petersen et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender

(2014) Anna Kaatz et al.   TRENDS IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES

Unpacking the Matthew effect in citations

(2014) Jian Wang   Journal of Informetrics

A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing

(2013) Fredrik Niclas Piro et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Disparities in publication patterns by gender, race and ethnicity based on a survey of a random sample of authors

(2012) Allison L. Hopkins et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs

(2011) Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus et al.   ACADEMIC MEDICINE

Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards

(2011) D. K. Ginther et al.   SCIENCE

Do gender, nationality, or academic age affect review decisions? An analysis of submissions to the journal Biological Conservation

(2009) Richard B. Primack et al.   BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION

Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model

(2008) Andrew C. Leon et al.   COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS

Journal review and gender equality: a critical comment on Budden et al.

(2008) R WHITTAKER   TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors

(2007) A BUDDEN et al.   TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION