Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-01-25
DOI
10.1007/s11948-020-00182-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Costs of Reproducibility
- (2019) Russell A. Poldrack NEURON
- Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium
- (2019) Alison Kretser et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis
- (2019) Alberto Baccini et al. PLoS One
- Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines
- (2019) Mario Malički et al. PLoS One
- Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts
- (2019) Samuel V. Bruton et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior
- (2018) Søren Holm et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
- (2018) David Moher et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Making the scientific literature fail-safe
- (2018) Arturo Casadevall et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
- In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices
- (2017) Donald F. Sacco et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates
- (2016) Anders Eklund et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Current Incentives for Scientists Lead to Underpowered Studies with Erroneous Conclusions
- (2016) Andrew D. Higginson et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency
- (2016) Mallory C. Kidwell et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
- (2016) Mark D. Wilkinson et al. Scientific Data
- The natural selection of bad science
- (2016) Paul E. Smaldino et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
- (2015) Diana Hicks et al. NATURE
- Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right
- (2015) Klaas Sijtsma PSYCHOMETRIKA
- Self-correction in science at work
- (2015) B. Alberts et al. SCIENCE
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices
- (2015) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions
- (2014) Jennifer J. Ware et al. ADDICTION
- Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms
- (2011) Arturo Casadevall et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Reforming Science: Structural Reforms
- (2011) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- The qualitative content analysis process
- (2008) Satu Elo et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search