Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts

Occurrence and nature of questionable research practices in the reporting of messages and conclusions in international scientific Health Services Research publications: a structured assessment of publications authored by researchers in the Netherlands

(2019) Reinie G Gerrits et al.   BMJ Open

The preregistration revolution

(2018) Brian A. Nosek et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Making the scientific literature fail-safe

(2018) Arturo Casadevall et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION

In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices

(2017) Donald F. Sacco et al.   Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Meta-assessment of bias in science

(2017) Daniele Fanelli et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review

(2017) Kellia Chiu et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists

(2017) Franca Agnoli et al.   PLoS One

Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research

(2017) Eric A. Fong et al.   PLoS One

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

(2016) Mallory C. Kidwell et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Commentary: Perverse Incentives or Rotten Apples?

(2015) Lex M. Bouter   Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Dishonesty in scientific research

(2015) Nina Mazar et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION

Bias Blind Spot: Structure, Measurement, and Consequences

(2015) Irene Scopelliti et al.   MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop

(2015) Regina Nuzzo   NATURE

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity

(2015) Daniele Fanelli et al.   PLoS One

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

(2015)   SCIENCE

Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions

(2014) David B. Resnik et al.   Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Significance chasing in research practice: causes, consequences and possible solutions

(2014) Jennifer J. Ware et al.   ADDICTION

The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention

(2014) Geoffrey L. Cohen et al.   Annual Review of Psychology

Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists

(2014) Joeri K. Tijdink et al.   Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

(2013) Katherine S. Button et al.   NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE

Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.

(2013) Paschal Sheeran et al.   PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN

Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end

(2012) L. L. Shu et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review

(2012) Daniel M. Herron   SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES

Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries

(2011) Daniele Fanelli   SCIENTOMETRICS

Avoidable Waste in the Production and Reporting of Research Evidence

(2009) Iain Chalmers et al.   OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

(2009) Daniele Fanelli   PLoS One