Making the scientific literature fail-safe

Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility

(2018) C. K. Gunsalus et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

The new watchdogs’ vision of science: A roundtable with Ivan Oransky (Retraction Watch) and Brandon Stell (PubPeer)

(2018) Emmanuel Didier et al.   SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE

Graduate Biomedical Science Education Needs a New Philosophy

(2017) Gundula Bosch et al.   mBio

The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications

(2016) Elisabeth M. Bik et al.   mBio

Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide

(2016) Arturo Casadevall et al.   mBio

Emerging trends in peer review—a survey

(2015) Richard Walker et al.   Frontiers in Neuroscience

Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results

(2014) Marcel A. L. M. van Assen et al.   PLoS One

Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania

(2014) A. Casadevall et al.   mBio

Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings

(2012) David B Resnik et al.   JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS

Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

(2012) C. Glenn Begley et al.   NATURE

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

(2012) F. C. Fang et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms

(2011) Arturo Casadevall et al.   INFECTION AND IMMUNITY

Reforming Science: Structural Reforms

(2011) Ferric C. Fang et al.   INFECTION AND IMMUNITY