Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines
Authors
Keywords
Scientific publishing, Medicine and health sciences, Peer review, Research integrity, Research reporting guidelines, Physical sciences, Publication ethics, Social sciences
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages e0222157
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2019-09-06
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0222157
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
- (2019) Ben Goldacre et al. Trials
- Reply to letter to the editor by C. Faggion: reproducibility and reporting guidelines
- (2018) Douglas G. Altman et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements
- (2018) Lisa M. Federer et al. PLoS One
- Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
- (2018) Hannah Fraser et al. PLoS One
- The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s
- (2017) Matthew Cobb PLOS BIOLOGY
- Impact factor: An assessment tool for journals or for scientists?
- (2017) Karem Slim et al. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
- Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors
- (2016) David B. Allison et al. NATURE
- Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014
- (2016) Larissa Shamseer et al. Trials
- Reviewing post-publication peer review
- (2015) Paul Knoepfler TRENDS IN GENETICS
- Study Design, Publication Outcome, and Funding of Research Presented at International Congresses on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication
- (2014) Mario Malicki et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Advancing Research through Replication
- (2014) Timothy L. Lash PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping
- (2014) Kyle Siler et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
- (2014) Vanja Pupovac et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
- (2014) A. Stevens et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
- (2014) Kerry Dwan et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Compliance with clinical trial registration and reporting guidelines by Latin American and Caribbean journals
- (2013) Ludovic Reveiz et al. Cadernos de Saude Publica
- Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data
- (2013) Timothy H. Vines et al. FASEB JOURNAL
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- All trials must be registered and the results published
- (2013) I. Chalmers et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator
- (2013) Ludo Waltman et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals
- (2012) Xavier Bosch et al. PLoS One
- Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines
- (2012) Lana Bošnjak et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing
- (2012) Ludo Waltman Journal of Informetrics
- Equal contributions and credit given to authors in critical care medicine journals during a 10-yr period*
- (2011) Fei Wang et al. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
- (2011) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study
- (2011) Peter Williams et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
- (2010) Lutz Bornmann et al. PLoS One
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search