Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Published 2011 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 891-904
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2011-09-10
DOI
10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
- (2010) Iveta Simera et al. BMC Medicine
- Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences
- (2010) BERNHARD STATZNER et al. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
- An Investigation of the Prevalence of Replication Research in Human Factors
- (2010) Keith S. Jones et al. HUMAN FACTORS
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- (2010) R. G. Steen JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Publish or perish in China
- (2010) Jane Qiu NATURE
- “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
- (2010) Marco Pautasso SCIENTOMETRICS
- Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance
- (2010) Carmen Osuna et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index
- (2010) Peder Olesen Larsen et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Legislation for trial registration and data transparency
- (2010) Zhao-Xiang Bian et al. Trials
- Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias
- (2008) Anton K. Formann Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated
- (2008) John P. A. Ioannidis EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- (2008) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Do new SCI journals have a different national bias?
- (2008) Robert D. Shelton et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Objective assessment of scientific performances world-wide
- (2008) Claudio Nicolini et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Perfect Study, Poor Evidence: Interpretation of Biases Preceding Study Design
- (2008) John P.A. Ioannidis SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
- (2008) Neal S Young et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started