Educational transformation in upper-division physics: The Science Education Initiative model, outcomes, and lessons learned
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Educational transformation in upper-division physics: The Science Education Initiative model, outcomes, and lessons learned
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Online
2015-09-24
DOI
10.1103/physrevstper.11.020110
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Unpacking students’ use of mathematics in upper-division physics: where do we go from here?
- (2015) Marcos D Caballero et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Upper-division student difficulties with the Dirac delta function
- (2015) Bethany R. Wilcox et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Increasing the Use of Evidence-Based Teaching in STEM Higher Education: A Comparison of Eight Change Strategies
- (2014) Maura Borrego et al. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION
- Use of research-based instructional strategies: How to avoid faculty quitting
- (2013) Carl Wieman et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Analytic framework for students’ use of mathematics in upper-division physics
- (2013) Bethany R. Wilcox et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Student understanding of Taylor series expansions in statistical mechanics
- (2013) Trevor I. Smith et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Surveying students’ understanding of quantum mechanics in one spatial dimension
- (2012) Guangtian Zhu et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Thinking like a physicist: A multi-semester case study of junior-level electricity and magnetism
- (2012) Stephanie V. Chasteen et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Colorado Upper-Division Electrostatics diagnostic: A conceptual assessment for the junior level
- (2012) Stephanie V. Chasteen et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Transforming the junior level: Outcomes from instruction and research in E&M
- (2012) Stephanie V. Chasteen et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Observations on student difficulties with mathematics in upper-division electricity and magnetism
- (2012) Rachel E. Pepper et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process?
- (2012) Charles Henderson et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods
- (2011) Louis Deslauriers et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty
- (2010) Melissa Dancy et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Do advanced physics students learn from their mistakes without explicit intervention?
- (2010) Andrew Mason et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Upper-division students’ difficulties with Ampère’s law
- (2010) Colin S. Wallace et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States
- (2009) Charles Henderson et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Promoting instructional change in new faculty: An evaluation of the physics and astronomy new faculty workshop
- (2008) Charles Henderson AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations
- (2007) Charles Henderson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started