Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency

A Community-Academic Partnership to Address Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities through Grant-Making

(2017) Michelle A. Ramos et al.   PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS

Creating a literature database of low-calorie sweeteners and health studies: evidence mapping

(2016) Ding Ding Wang et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

A randomized trial of fellowships for early career researchers finds a high reliability in funding decisions

(2016) Philip Clarke et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

A Quantitative Linguistic Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques From Investigators at One Institution

(2015) Anna Kaatz et al.   ACADEMIC MEDICINE

Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study

(2015) Adrian G Barnett et al.   BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH

Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment

(2015) Michael S. Lauer et al.   CIRCULATION RESEARCH

Association of percentile ranking with citation impact and productivity in a large cohort of de novo NIMH-funded R01 grants

(2015) J M Doyle et al.   MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY

Factors Impacting Successfully Competing for Research Funding

(2015) Keith M. Hume et al.   PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY

Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research

(2015) David G. Pina et al.   PLoS One

Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores

(2015) Mark D. Lindner et al.   PLoS One

Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?

(2015) D. Li et al.   SCIENCE

Frequency and Type of Conflicts of Interest in the Peer Review of Basic Biomedical Research Funding Applications: Self-Reporting Versus Manual Detection

(2015) Stephen A. Gallo et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study

(2015) Danielle L Herbert et al.   BMJ Open

A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels

(2015) Afton S Carpenter et al.   BMJ Open

Grant Peer Review: Improving Inter-Rater Reliability with Training

(2015) David N. Sattler et al.   PLoS One

Menage a Quoi? Optimal Number of Peer Reviewers

(2015) Richard R. Snell   PLoS One

Engaging Patients and Stakeholders in Research Proposal Review: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

(2014) Rachael L. Fleurence et al.   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Prior Publication Productivity, Grant Percentile Ranking, and Topic-Normalized Citation Impact of NHLBI Cardiovascular R01 Grants

(2014) Jonathan R. Kaltman et al.   CIRCULATION RESEARCH

Characterization of the Peer Review Network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health

(2014) Kevin W. Boyack et al.   PLoS One

The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies

(2014) Stephen A. Gallo et al.   PLoS One

Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?

(2013) Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo et al.   PLoS One

Teleconference versus Face-to-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Application: Effects on Review Outcomes

(2013) Stephen A. Gallo et al.   PLoS One

Supporting cancer survivors’ participation in peer review: perspectives from NCI’s CARRA program

(2013) Melissa B. Gilkey   Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Bias in peer review

(2012) Carole J. Lee et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices

(2012) Hendy Abdoul et al.   PLoS One

Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach

(2012) Rüdiger Mutz et al.   PLoS One

Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals

(2011) Mikael Fogelholm et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives

(2010) Sara Schroter et al.   BMC Medicine

Research funding: Making the cut

(2010) Kendall Powell   NATURE

An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH

(2010) Michael R. Martin et al.   PLoS One

Peer review of grant applications in biology and medicine. Reliability, fairness, and validity

(2009) Martin Reinhart   SCIENTOMETRICS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2009) David Moher et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Why Are Peer Review Outcomes Less Favorable for Clinical Science than for Basic Science Grant Applications?

(2008) Michael R. Martin et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system

(2008) V. E. Johnson   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review

(2008) Lutz Bornmann et al.   Journal of Informetrics