The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Systematic Reviews
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2023-10-13
DOI
10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations.
- (2023) Michael M Schlussel et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The development methods of official GRADE articles and requirements for claiming the use of GRADE – A statement by the GRADE guidance group
- (2023) Holger J. Schünemann et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study
- (2022) Phi-Yen Nguyen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
- (2021) Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al. Systematic Reviews
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension
- (2021) Rose E. O'Dea et al. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): checklist, explanation, and elaboration
- (2021) Jérémie F Cohen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Users’ experiences with an interactive Evidence to Decision (iEtD) framework: a qualitative analysis
- (2021) Jose Francisco Meneses-Echavez et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis
- (2021) Areti Angeliki Veroniki et al. Systematic Reviews
- PRISMA extension for moxibustion 2020: recommendations, explanation, and elaboration
- (2020) Xuan Zhang et al. Systematic Reviews
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
- (2019) David Blanco et al. BMJ Open
- Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist
- (2019) Xiaoqin Wang et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
- (2019) Anthony Chauvin et al. BMC Medicine
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
- (2018) Matthew D. F. McInnes et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews—paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist
- (2017) Jeanne-Marie Guise et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions
- (2017) Tammy C Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions
- (2017) Tammy C Hoffmann et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial
- (2016) Sally Hopewell et al. BMC Medicine
- Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study
- (2016) Riaz Ahmed Agha et al. International Journal of Surgery
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
- (2015) Caroline Barnes et al. BMC Medicine
- Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2015) David Moher BMC Medicine
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data
- (2015) Lesley A. Stewart et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
- (2013) Nikola Panic et al. PLoS One
- PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
- (2013) Elaine M. Beller et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity
- (2012) Vivian Welch et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews
- (2010) Sarah E. Rosenbaum et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: User testing of The Cochrane Library
- (2008) Sarah E Rosenbaum et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More