4.4 Review

The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence

期刊

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02363-6

关键词

Systematic reviews; Meta-analysis; Reporting; Transparency; Methodology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PRISMATIC project aims to improve the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews by using novel methods to translate PRISMA reporting guidelines into practice. They plan to develop a unified PRISMA statement, a web application for authors to generate customized reporting templates, a web application for peer reviewers to appraise systematic review manuscripts, and conduct studies to evaluate the impact of these tools. The project expects that these developments will enhance reporting quality and benefit users who rely on systematic reviews for healthcare decision-making.
BackgroundIncomplete reporting about what systematic reviewers did and what they found prevents users of the report from being able to fully interpret the findings and understand the limitations of the underlying evidence. Reporting guidelines such as the PRISMA statement and its extensions are designed to improve reporting. However, there are important inconsistencies across the various PRISMA reporting guidelines, which causes confusion and misinterpretation. Coupled with this, users might need to consult multiple guidelines to gain a full understanding of the guidance. Furthermore, the current passive strategy of implementing PRISMA has not fully brought about needed improvements in the completeness of systematic review reporting.MethodsThe PRISMATIC ('PRISMA, Technology, and Implementation to enhance reporting Completeness') project aims to use novel methods to enable more efficient and effective translation of PRISMA reporting guidelines into practice. We will establish a working group who will develop a unified PRISMA statement that harmonises content across the main PRISMA guideline and several of its extensions. We will then develop a web application that generates a reporting template and checklist customised to the characteristics and methods of a systematic review ('PRISMA-Web app') and conduct a randomised trial to evaluate its impact on authors' reporting. We will also develop a web application that helps peer reviewers appraise systematic review manuscripts ('PRISMA-Peer app') and conduct a diagnostic accuracy study to evaluate its impact on peer reviewers' detection of incomplete reporting.DiscussionWe anticipate the novel guidance and web-based apps developed throughout the project will substantively enhance the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of health evidence, ultimately benefiting users who rely on systematic reviews to inform health care decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据