What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Research Synthesis Methods
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2023-09-12
DOI
10.1002/jrsm.1664
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- We extended the 2-week systematic review (2weekSR) methodology to larger, more complex systematic reviews: A case series
- (2023) Anna Mae Scott et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users
- (2023) Chantelle Garritty et al. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
- Methodological guidance for rapid reviews in healthcare: A scoping review
- (2022) Christian Speckemeier et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- An overview of methodological approaches in systematic reviews
- (2022) Prabhakar Veginadu et al. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
- Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews
- (2021) Xuan Qin et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references
- (2021) Sandra McKeown et al. Systematic Reviews
- Crowdsourcing citation-screening in a mixed-studies systematic review: a feasibility study
- (2021) Anna H. Noel-Storr et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Machine learning for identifying relevant publications in updates of systematic reviews of diagnostic test studies
- (2021) Toni Lange et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Iterative guided machine learning-assisted systematic literature reviews: a diabetes case study
- (2021) John Zimmerman et al. Systematic Reviews
- Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews
- (2021) Kevin E. K. Chai et al. Systematic Reviews
- Successful incorporation of single reviewer assessments during systematic review screening: development and validation of sensitivity and work-saved of an algorithm that considers exclusion criteria and count
- (2021) Nassr Nama et al. Systematic Reviews
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J. Page et al. Systematic Reviews
- Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review
- (2021) B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Rapid evidence synthesis approach for limits on the search date: how rapid could it be?
- (2021) Chang Xu et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
- (2021) Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses
- (2021) Candyce Hamel et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey
- (2021) Anna Mae Scott et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis
- (2021) Julian Elliott et al. NATURE
- Applying machine classifiers to update searches: Analysis from two case studies
- (2021) Claire Stansfield et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review
- (2021) Hanan Khalil et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evidence synthesis 2.0: when systematic, scoping, rapid, living, and overviews of reviews come together
- (2020) Elie A. Akl et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews
- (2020) Jian‐Yu E et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial
- (2020) Gerald Gartlehner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study
- (2020) Justin Clark et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr’s relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews
- (2020) Allison Gates et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Abbreviated and comprehensive literature searches led to identical or very similar effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
- (2020) Hannah Ewald et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes
- (2020) C. Hamel et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Citation screening using crowdsourcing and machine learning produced accurate results: evaluation of Cochrane’s modified Screen4Me service
- (2020) Anna Noel-Storr et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews
- (2020) Candyce Hamel et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews
- (2020) Chantelle Garritty et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Few evaluative studies exist examining rapid review methodology across stages of conduct: a systematic scoping review
- (2020) Candyce Hamel et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Improving the precision of search strategies for guideline surveillance
- (2020) Monica Casey et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Aligning text mining and machine learning algorithms with best practices for study selection in systematic literature reviews
- (2020) E. Popoff et al. Systematic Reviews
- Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews
- (2020) Allison Gates et al. Systematic Reviews
- Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, cost and value of contacting study authors in a systematic review: a case study and worked example
- (2019) Chris Cooper et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Crowdsourcing the Citation Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation Study
- (2019) Nassr Nama et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review
- (2019) Siw Waffenschmidt et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews
- (2019) Carolyn R.T. Stoll et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Can artificial intelligence replace manual search for systematic literature? Review on cutaneous manifestations in primary Sjögren’s syndrome
- (2019) Laure Orgeolet et al. RHEUMATOLOGY
- Rapid network meta-analysis using data from Food and Drug Administration approval packages is feasible but with limitations
- (2019) Lin Wang et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews
- (2019) Tianjing Li et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Rapid reviews of medical tests used many similar methods to systematic reviews but key items were rarely reported: a scoping review
- (2019) Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2019) B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Use of Rapid Review Methods for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- (2018) Carrie D. Patnode et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews
- (2018) Emily Reynen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Abbreviated literature searches were viable alternatives to comprehensive searches: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2018) B. Nussbaumer-Streit et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses
- (2018) Richeek Pradhan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2018) Iain Marshall et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The impact of the peer review of literature search strategies in support of rapid review reports
- (2018) Carolyn Spry et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Features and functioning of Data Abstraction Assistant, a software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews
- (2018) Jens Jap et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review
- (2018) Reid C. Robson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Testing the effectiveness of simplified search strategies for updating systematic reviews
- (2017) Maureen Rice et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Comparison of a full systematic review versus rapid review approaches to assess a newborn screening test for tyrosinemia type 1
- (2017) Sian Taylor-Phillips et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research
- (2017) Christine M. Schmucker et al. PLoS One
- USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?
- (2016) Jessica Tajana Mattivi et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health
- (2016) Mai T. Pham et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Methods for Developing Evidence Reviews in Short Periods of Time: A Scoping Review
- (2016) Ahmed M. Abou-Setta et al. PLoS One
- A scoping review of rapid review methods
- (2015) Andrea C. Tricco et al. BMC Medicine
- Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies
- (2015) Michelle M. Haby et al. Implementation Science
- Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions
- (2015) Christopher W. Halladay et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
- (2014) Kathryn Oliver et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews
- (2014) Zhen Wang et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An efficient strategy allowed English-speaking reviewers to identify foreign-language articles eligible for a systematic review
- (2014) Jason W. Busse et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Titles versus titles and abstracts for initial screening of articles for systematic reviews
- (2013) Farrah Mateen et al. Clinical Epidemiology
- THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES
- (2012) Andra Morrison et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?
- (2010) Amber Watt et al. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy
- (2009) Jennifer Horton et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now