Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review
Authors
Keywords
Evidence synthesis, Time, Personnel, Costs, Resources, Efficient
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-06-04
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.019
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study
- (2020) Justin Clark et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Methodologically rigorous risk of bias tools for non-randomized studies had low reliability and high evaluator burden
- (2020) Maya M. Jeyaraman et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- What evidence-based research is and why is it important?
- (2020) Karen A. Robinson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Using an evidence-based research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value
- (2020) Hans Lund et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency, cost and value of contacting study authors in a systematic review: a case study and worked example
- (2019) Chris Cooper et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Crowdsourcing the Citation Screening Process for Systematic Reviews: Validation Study
- (2019) Nassr Nama et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks
- (2019) Eliza M. Grames et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- A randomized trial provided new evidence on the accuracy and efficiency of traditional vs. electronically annotated abstraction approaches in systematic reviews
- (2019) Tianjing Li et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Improving the Conduct of Systematic Reviews: A Process Mining Perspective
- (2018) Ba’ Pham et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses
- (2018) Richeek Pradhan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The INVEST project: investigating the use of evidence synthesis in the design and analysis of clinical trials
- (2017) Gemma L. Clayton et al. Trials
- PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement
- (2016) Jessie McGowan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction
- (2016) Antonia Jelicic Kadic et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: validation showed the noninferiority of the objective approach
- (2015) Elke Hausner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions
- (2014) Kath Wright et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Dual computer monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews
- (2014) Zhen Wang et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity
- (2013) Soo Young Kim et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Applying the Risk of Bias Tool in a Systematic Review of Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids for Persistent Asthma
- (2011) Lisa Hartling et al. PLoS One
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
- (2010) Danielle Levac et al. Implementation Science
- Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews
- (2010) Rebecca Ganann et al. Implementation Science
- Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting
- (2010) Mike Clarke et al. LANCET
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
- (2009) Beverley J. Shea et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy
- (2009) Jennifer Horton et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started