The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Systematic Reviews
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-03-30
DOI
10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
- (2021) Melissa L. Rethlefsen et al. Systematic Reviews
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
- (2021) Matthew J Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline
- (2020) Mhairi Campbell et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- (2020) Benjamin Speich et al. BMJ Open
- COSMOS-E: Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology
- (2019) Olaf M. Dekkers et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance
- (2019) Emma F. France et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
- (2019) David Blanco et al. BMJ Open
- Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist
- (2019) Xiaoqin Wang et al. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
- (2019) Jonathan A C Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Evaluation of Reproducible Research Practices in Oncology Systematic Reviews With Meta-analyses Referenced by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines
- (2019) Cole Wayant et al. JAMA Oncology
- Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study
- (2019) Anthony Chauvin et al. BMC Medicine
- Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA
- (2019) Victoria Leclercq et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines
- (2019) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A consensus-based transparency checklist
- (2019) Balazs Aczel et al. Nature Human Behaviour
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies
- (2018) Matthew D. F. McInnes et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions
- (2018) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis
- (2018) Matthew J. Page et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide
- (2018) Iain J. Marshall et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
- (2018) Jessica Gurevitch et al. NATURE
- Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
- (2018) David Moher BMC Medicine
- Graphics and statistics for cardiology: designing effective tables for presentation and publication
- (2017) Maarten Boers HEART
- The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence
- (2017) Monica Hultcrantz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with examples from the MUDS study)
- (2017) Evan Mayo-Wilson et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study
- (2016) Riaz Ahmed Agha et al. International Journal of Surgery
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews
- (2016) Liliane Zorzela et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial
- (2015) Caroline Barnes et al. BMC Medicine
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data
- (2015) Lesley A. Stewart et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
- (2015) L. Shamseer et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
- (2014) A. Stevens et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Alessandro Liberati ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
- (2013) Nikola Panic et al. PLoS One
- PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
- (2013) Elaine M. Beller et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity
- (2012) Vivian Welch et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
- (2010) Iveta Simera et al. BMC Medicine
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
- (2010) David Moher et al. International Journal of Surgery
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
- (2010) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search