Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review
Authors
Keywords
Abstract screening, Artificial intelligence, Automation, Machine learning, Reliability, Systematic review
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 22-42
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-12-09
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.005
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews
- (2021) Xuan Qin et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Evidence synthesis in the time of COVID-19
- (2021) Robin J. Bell CLIMACTERIC
- Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews
- (2021) Kevin E. K. Chai et al. Systematic Reviews
- Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow
- (2021) Ba’ Pham et al. Systematic Reviews
- Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation
- (2020) Hannah Harrison et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Comparing machine and human reviewers to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials
- (2020) Susan Armijo‐Olivo et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study
- (2020) Justin Clark et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr’s relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews
- (2020) Allison Gates et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Not all systematic reviews can be completed in 2 weeks—But many can be (and should be)
- (2020) Justin Clark et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening – impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes
- (2020) C. Hamel et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Can we use artificial intelligence for systematic literature review in rheumatology?
- (2020) Nathan Foulquier et al. JOINT BONE SPINE
- Can artificial intelligence replace manual search for systematic literature? Review on cutaneous manifestations in primary Sjögren’s syndrome
- (2019) Laure Orgeolet et al. RHEUMATOLOGY
- PNS335 USING MACHINE LEARNING FOR EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS IN SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS OF CLINICAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY
- (2019) N. Halfpenny et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: a prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool
- (2018) Allison Gates et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: a user study
- (2018) Piotr Przybyła et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses
- (2018) Richeek Pradhan et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Man Versus Machine - Is Accurate Automation of Data Abstraction Achievable?
- (2016) C Kiff et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Automated confidence ranked classification of randomized controlled trial articles: an aid to evidence-based medicine
- (2015) Aaron M Cohen et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials
- (2015) Iain J Marshall et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION
- Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews
- (2014) Miew Keen Choong et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- ExaCT: automatic extraction of clinical trial characteristics from journal publications
- (2010) Svetlana Kiritchenko et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started