Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines
Published 2023 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages e0270054
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2023-03-09
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0270054
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?
- (2021) Stylianos Serghiou et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Mapping open knowledge institutions: an exploratory analysis of Australian universities
- (2021) Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang et al. PeerJ
- Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists
- (2021) Ksenija Baždarić et al. PLoS One
- Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
- (2021) Mario Malički et al. Nature Communications
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
- (2020) David Moher et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers
- (2020) Gehad Mohamed Tawfik et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption
- (2020) Anneke Zuiderwijk et al. PLoS One
- Postdoc survey reveals disenchantment with working life
- (2020) Chris Woolston NATURE
- Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories
- (2019) Gregory S. Patience et al. PLoS One
- Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines
- (2019) Mario Malički et al. PLoS One
- Honorary authorship in cardiothoracic surgery
- (2019) Anahita Noruzi et al. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
- Using the STROBE statement: survey findings emphasized the role of journals in enforcing reporting guidelines
- (2019) Melissa K. Sharp et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Some hard numbers on science’s leadership problems
- (2018) Richard Van Noorden NATURE
- Academics' behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals
- (2017) Jennifer Rowley et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Joeri K. Tijdink et al. PLoS One
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- What Affects Authors’ and Editors’ Use of Reporting Guidelines? Findings from an Online Survey and Qualitative Interviews
- (2015) Thomas Fuller et al. PLoS One
- Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys
- (2014) Vanja Pupovac et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
- (2013) Daniele Fanelli PLOS MEDICINE
- A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines
- (2011) Ana Marušić et al. PLoS One
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now