What Affects Authors’ and Editors’ Use of Reporting Guidelines? Findings from an Online Survey and Qualitative Interviews
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
What Affects Authors’ and Editors’ Use of Reporting Guidelines? Findings from an Online Survey and Qualitative Interviews
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages e0121585
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2015-04-16
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0121585
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Impact of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs Reporting Guideline: Ten Years On
- (2014) Thomas Fuller et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste
- (2014) Malcolm R Macleod et al. LANCET
- Are Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Improving over Time? A Systematic Review of 284 Articles Published in High-Impact General and Specialized Medical Journals
- (2014) Matthew J. To et al. PLoS One
- Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review
- (2014) A. Stevens et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Towards a general theory of implementation
- (2013) Carl May Implementation Science
- No health research without education for research – experience from an integrated course in undergraduate medical curriculum
- (2013) Ana Marušić et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 Reporting Guideline: the Perspectives of Systematic Review Authors
- (2013) Belinda J. Burford et al. PLoS One
- Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines
- (2012) Thomas Fuller et al. BMJ Open
- Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review
- (2011) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Medical journal editors lacked familiarity with scientific publication issues despite training and regular exposure
- (2011) Victoria S.S. Wong et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Publication guidelines need widespread adoption
- (2011) Elaine L. Larson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study
- (2011) B. R. da Costa et al. BMJ Open
- Reporting Policies andHeadache
- (2010) HEADACHE
- Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely
- (2009) D. G. Altman et al. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
- Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
- (2009) E Wager et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project
- (2008) F Davidoff et al. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE
- Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'
- (2008) Sally Hopewell et al. Trials
- Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: The EQUATOR Network's Survey of Guideline Authors
- (2008) Iveta Simera et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started