- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLOS MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages e1001563
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2013-12-04
DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Guidance on research integrity: no union in Europe
- (2013) S Godecharle et al. LANCET
- Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting
- (2013) Daniele Fanelli NATURE
- Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
- (2013) R. Grant Steen et al. PLoS One
- US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
- (2013) D. Fanelli et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Shaking Up Science
- (2013) J. Couzin-Frankel SCIENCE
- Global Research Integrity Training
- (2013) N. H. Steneck SCIENCE
- Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not
- (2013) A. Kaatz et al. mBio
- Research Misconduct in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- (2013) Joseph Ana et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- (2012) David B Resnik et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey
- (2012) Hendrik P. van Dalen et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature
- (2012) Michael L. Grieneisen et al. PLoS One
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
- (2012) F. C. Fang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
- (2011) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008
- (2011) E. Wager et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Changing Incentives to Publish
- (2011) C. Franzoni et al. SCIENCE
- Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study
- (2011) Peter Williams et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- The dangers of performance-based research funding in non-competitive higher education systems
- (2011) Giovanni Abramo et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
- (2011) Daniele Fanelli SCIENTOMETRICS
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- (2010) R. G. Steen JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- (2010) R. G. Steen JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases
- (2010) Marco Pautasso SCIENTOMETRICS
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
- (2009) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
- Deja vu: a database of highly similar citations in the scientific literature
- (2008) M. Errami et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Letter to the Editor: Bias in genetic association studies: effects of research location and resources
- (2008) MARCUS R. MUNAFÒ et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started