Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-08-25
DOI
10.1186/s12874-020-01094-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey
- (2019) Chang Xu et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Providing transparency in systematic review methods: The case for protocol registration
- (2019) Alison Booth GERODONTOLOGY
- Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study
- (2019) Yasushi Tsujimoto et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research
- (2018) Guowei Li et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2018) Long Ge et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Multiple overlapping systematic reviews facilitate the origin of disputes: the case of thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism
- (2018) Nicoletta Riva et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
- (2017) F Naudet et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2017) Yasushi Tsujimoto et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- What is the future of biomedical research?
- (2015) Giovanni Domenico Tebala MEDICAL HYPOTHESES
- Duplicate publication of articles used in meta-analysis in Korea
- (2014) Whan-Seok Choi et al. SpringerPlus
- Trusting researchers to use open trial registers such as PROSPERO responsibly
- (2013) A. Booth et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- The problem of duplicate systematic reviews
- (2013) D. Moher BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies
- (2013) K. C. Siontis et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO
- (2012) Patrick FW Chien et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews
- (2010) Paul P Glasziou et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- An international registry of systematic-review protocols
- (2010) Alison Booth et al. LANCET
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- (2010) Hilda Bastian et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Registering systematic reviews
- (2009) S. Straus et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist
- (2009) Andrea C. Tricco et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program
- (2009) Evelyn P. Whitlock et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A very low response rate in an on-line survey of medical practitioners
- (2008) Campbell Aitken et al. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started