Examination of quantitative methods for analyzing data from concept inventories
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Examination of quantitative methods for analyzing data from concept inventories
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Online
2020-06-30
DOI
10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.010141
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories
- (2020) Vincent P. Coletta et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
- (2020) Philip Eaton et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Associations between learning assistants, passing introductory physics, and equity: A quantitative critical race theory investigation
- (2020) Ben Van Dusen et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Partitioning the gender gap in physics conceptual inventories: Force Concept Inventory, Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation, and Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
- (2019) Rachel Henderson et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Longitudinal predictions using regression-corrected grouping to reduce regression to the mean
- (2019) S. Stephens et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Modernizing use of regression models in physics education research: A review of hierarchical linear modeling
- (2019) Ben Van Dusen et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Beyond linear regression: A reference for analyzing common data types in discipline based education research
- (2019) Elli J. Theobald et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for analyzing gains on concept inventories
- (2018) Jayson M. Nissen et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Students Are Rarely Independent: When, Why, and How to Use Random Effects in Discipline-Based Education Research
- (2018) Elli Theobald CBE-Life Sciences Education
- lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models
- (2017) Alexandra Kuznetsova et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
- (2017) Rachel Henderson et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Gender gaps and gendered action in a first-year physics laboratory
- (2016) James Day et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines
- (2016) Sarah L. Eddy et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: What is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap?
- (2013) Adrian Madsen et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Impact of equity models and statistical measures on interpretations of educational reform
- (2012) Idaykis Rodriguez et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a “smog of bias”
- (2010) Lauren E. Kost-Smith et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
- Exploring gender differences with different gain calculations in astronomy and biology
- (2009) Shannon D. Willoughby et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
- Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics
- (2009) Lauren E. Kost et al. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search