IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS

Journal Title
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS

IEEE T COMPUT AID D

ISSN / eISSN
0278-0070
Aims and Scope
The purpose of this Transactions is to publish papers of interest to individuals in the area of computer-aided design of integrated circuits and systems composed of analog, digital, mixed-signal, optical, or microwave components. The aids include methods, models, algorithms, and man-machine interfaces for system-level, physical and logical design including: planning, synthesis, partitioning, modeling, simulation, layout, verification, testing, hardware-software co-design and documentation of integrated circuit and system designs of all complexities. Design tools and techniques for evaluating and designing integrated circuits and systems for metrics such as performance, power, reliability, testability, and security are a focus.
Subject Area

COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE

COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS

ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC

CiteScore
5.20 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Computer Science - Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design Q1 #24/102
Computer Science - Electrical and Electronic Engineering Q2 #216/738
Computer Science - Software Q2 #152/404
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE - SCIE Q2
COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS - SCIE Q3
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE Q2
H-index
107
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Annual Article Volume
459
Open Access
NO
Contact
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
I have previously submitted an article, which was rejected after major revisions in the second round of review. Indeed, the article was not well-developed and lacked innovation. The reviewers' comments were very constructive, and after making revisions, I submitted it to another journal for acceptance.

This time, I started submitting in late April, and I am more confident about this submission.
After about two months, the first review came back with major revisions. The three reviewers provided a lot of comments, which were straightforward and very helpful for improving the article. I added experiments, comparisons, and provided more detailed descriptions of the methods before resubmitting.
The second review also took two months and required major revisions again. The three reviewers provided many excellent suggestions regarding the added experiments. However, I didn't feel it required major revisions. Perhaps the editor was strict, and I carefully addressed the reviewers' concerns before resubmitting.
The third review took about a month and a half, and the article was accepted. It turned out that there were actually five reviewers in total. I guess the reviewers were not the same for all three rounds. One of the reviewers wrote a detailed evaluation of seven to eight hundred words. The journal really found reviewers who truly understand the subject matter. The final accepted version differed greatly from the initial draft.

The overall submission process took six months.
I suggest that those working on EDA-related topics submit their articles. Even if they are not accepted, the reviewers' comments and suggestions are very helpful for improving the article.
2021-11-23
The result came out two months after the first review with five reviewers who raised many crucial questions. The overall feedback was major revision. The second review also took two months and only had two comments (although they were previously mentioned by other reviewers). It still required minor revision. Finally, it passed the final review. It is a top journal in CCF A class! But why is it only considered as a third-tier journal...
2021-05-31

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now