Journal Title
IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS

IEEE ELECTR DEVICE L

ISSN / eISSN
0741-3106
Aims and Scope
IEEE Electron Device Letters publishes original and significant contributions relating to the theory, modeling, design, performance and reliability of electron and ion integrated circuit devices and interconnects, involving insulators, metals, organic materials, micro-plasmas, semiconductors, quantum-effect structures, vacuum devices, and emerging materials with applications in bioelectronics, biomedical electronics, computation, communications, displays, microelectromechanics, imaging, micro-actuators, nanoelectronics, optoelectronics, photovoltaics, power ICs and micro-sensors.
Subject Area

ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC

CiteScore
8.20 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Engineering - Electrical and Electronic Engineering Q1 #106/738
Engineering - Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials Q1 #48/271
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC - SCIE Q2
H-index
135
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Year Publication Started
1980
Annual Article Volume
522
Open Access
NO
Contact
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
It's really important to be lucky when submitting to this journal. Encountering a suitable editor is your first step to success, followed by finding suitable reviewers, and also depends on whether you have influential authors. I submitted a work that I believed to be world-leading, but it was rejected during the second round of review. The first round had two reviewers, while the second round had five! Among the five reviewers, four said they were very interested in the article but suggested adding some content, and one accepted it directly. Five of them! Just one sentence from each reviewer made the editor think that the article would require major revisions, which goes against the spirit of the journal and the second round of review does not allow major revisions. I give up, really. I accepted the rejection of my article, but I'm afraid that my work will be copied by the reviewers.
2023-07-20
2021.07.26 Submission
2021.09.04 Major revision
2021.09.14 Resubmission
2021.10.06 Acceptance
2021.11.25 Published
During my master's studies, this is my first paper. The journal has very strict formatting requirements, and it was returned to me two or three times due to format issues.
There were two reviewers, one approved the work, while the other mentioned a lack of innovation. The editor ultimately requested a major revision, which was submitted again after ten days of modifications, and it was accepted.
I have fulfilled the graduation requirements, and I am happy.
I hope the journal continues to improve.
2021-11-25

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation