CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY

Journal Title
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN MICROBIOLOGY

CRIT REV MICROBIOL

ISSN / eISSN
1040-841X / 1549-7828
Aims and Scope
Critical Reviews in Microbiology is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes comprehensive reviews covering all areas of microbiology relevant to humans and animals, including medical and veterinary microbiology, public health and environmental microbiology. These may include subjects related to microbial molecular biology, immunopathogenicity, physiology, biochemistry, structure, and epidemiology. Of particular interest are reviews covering clinical aspects of bacterial, virological, fungal and parasitic diseases. All reviews must be analytical, comprehensive, and balanced in nature. Editors welcome uninvited submissions, as well as suggested topics for reviews accompanied by an abstract.
Subject Area

MICROBIOLOGY

CiteScore
13.10 View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
Category Quartile Rank
Immunology and Microbiology - Microbiology Q1 #13/163
Immunology and Microbiology - Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Q1 #10/121
Web of Science Core Collection
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) Quartile
MICROBIOLOGY - SCIE Q1
H-index
76
Country/Area of Publication
UNITED STATES
Publisher
Informa Healthcare
Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Year Publication Started
1980
Annual Article Volume
54
Open Access
NO
Contact
INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 52 VANDERBILT AVE, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10017
Verified Reviews
Note: Verified reviews are sourced from across review platforms and social media globally.
Submitted on January 17th in recent years, it took one week to be "With Editor" and another week to be "Out for Review". This status lasted for more than 5 months. During this period, a reminder was sent after 3 months, and it was mentioned that only one reviewer's feedback had been received, while waiting for the other reviewer's feedback. After the external review was completed, the results were received within 3 days, and both reviewers suggested minor revisions. Overall, the email responses were timely, and the editor's attitude was good, but the process took too long.
2023-07-04
After 3 months of submission, a reply was received requesting major revisions; what's ridiculous is that the reviewer rejected it, claiming not to have seen the response letter. What a waste of 4 whole months, quite frustrating.
2022-02-25

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started