Engineering Construction and Architectural Management
Note: The following journal information is for reference only. Please check the journal website for updated information prior to submission.
Journal Title
Engineering Construction and Architectural Management
ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA
ISSN / eISSN
0969-9988 / 1365-232X
Aims and Scope
ECAM publishes original peer-reviewed research papers, case studies, technical notes, book reviews, features, discussions and other contemporary articles that advance research and practice in engineering, construction and architectural management. In particular, ECAM seeks to advance integrated design and construction practices, project lifecycle management, and sustainable construction. The journal’s scope covers all aspects of architectural design, design management, construction/project management, engineering management of major infrastructure projects, and the operation and management of constructed facilities. ECAM also addresses the technological, process, economic/business, environmental/sustainability, political, and social/human developments that influence the construction project delivery process.
ECAM strives to establish strong theoretical and empirical debates in the above areas of engineering, architecture, and construction research. Papers should be heavily integrated with the existing and current body of knowledge within the field and develop explicit and novel contributions. Acknowledging the global character of the field, we welcome papers on regional studies but encourage authors to position the work within the broader international context by reviewing and comparing findings from their regional study with studies conducted in other regions or countries whenever possible.
ECAM strives to establish strong theoretical and empirical debates in the above areas of engineering, architecture, and construction research. Papers should be heavily integrated with the existing and current body of knowledge within the field and develop explicit and novel contributions. Acknowledging the global character of the field, we welcome papers on regional studies but encourage authors to position the work within the broader international context by reviewing and comparing findings from their regional study with studies conducted in other regions or countries whenever possible.
Subject Area
ENGINEERING, CIVIL
ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
MANAGEMENT
CiteScore
7.00
View Trend
CiteScore Ranking
| Category | Quartile | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering - Architecture | Q1 | #5/170 |
| Engineering - General Business, Management and Accounting | Q1 | #24/214 |
| Engineering - Building and Construction | Q1 | #31/200 |
| Engineering - Civil and Structural Engineering | Q1 | #56/350 |
Web of Science Core Collection
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | Indexed |
| Category (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | Quartile |
|---|---|
| ENGINEERING, CIVIL - SCIE | Q2 |
| ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL - SCIE | Q2 |
| MANAGEMENT - SSCI | Q3 |
H-index
49
Country/Area of Publication
United Kingdom
Publisher
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Publication Frequency
irregular
Year Publication Started
1994
Annual Article Volume
270
Open Access
NO
Contact
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD , HOWARD HOUSE, WAGON LANE, BINGLEY, ENGLAND, W YORKSHIRE, BD16 1WA
Verified Reviews
Here are a few selected opinions:
Reviewer 1 (raised 8 questions): The abstract quality is very poor. Originality is not apparent. No explanation on why this model was used, and so on. The writing is too long. A serious rejection.
Reviewer 2 (only three lines): No listing, overall, the literature review, data processing, and significance analysis are all inadequate. Suggest rewriting. (_(:з」∠)_)
The following points were mentioned and need attention:
1. The literature review should be systematic.
2. Originality and innovation, or significance, are necessary.
3. The abstract needs to be well-written.
4. Data processing and analysis are crucial.
Wishing everyone success in their papers! ＼(`Δ')／
Sharing my submission process:
2021-04-12: Submitted
2021-04-22: Passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection
---- Afterward, it was a long process of finding reviewers and reviewing----
2021-10-16: Major Revision
2021-10-27: A revision has been submitted
2021-12-04: Major Revision
2021-12-09: A revision has been submitted
2022-01-07: Accepted
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started