Join the Reviewer Roulette Hub
Share your experience with a Peer Review Champion or Peer Review Antagonist. Select the category that best describes your experience, and then provide the quote, context, and the journal you submitted to. Please refrain from publishing any personal information, including names or email addresses.
Peer Review Champion Positive
This paper describes the usage of Bayesian Networks to estimate the Quality of Experience metric from users subjective preference. In particular, the...
- Comment from Јournal of Mobile Multimedia reviewer
Peer Review Champion Positive
- Section 3.3.1, lines 310-314: Regarding the UOW, it can also be used to produce mortars (https://doi.org/10.1590/0366-69132019653752562 / https://do...
- Comment from Case Studies in Construction Materials reviewer
Peer Review Champion Positive
Dear author, first of all, I wish to thank you very much for the very comprehensive revision you provided. I'm especially impressed by the careful doc...
- Comment from International Journal of Fatigue reviewer
Peer Review Champion Positive
All data sets are presented, accompanied by R codes, which have made the replication and reproduction of the results both easy and transparent. Having...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer