Join the Reviewer Roulette Hub
Share your experience with a Peer Review Champion or Peer Review Antagonist. Select the category that best describes your experience, and then provide the quote, context, and the journal you submitted to. Please refrain from publishing any personal information, including names or email addresses.
Peer Review Champion Constructive
3. I would term this section "Results" instead of case presentation. This section would then have two sub-sections: case presentation and results of t...
- Comment from Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disea... reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
After my reaction to the initial rejection by the Associate Editor, the Publishing Editor responded promptly and in a positive way, showing a kind ge...
- Comment from New Journal of Chemistry reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
Overall,this study is well-executed with mostly appropriate methods (see phylogenetic analysis comments below), well written and relevant to the expan...
- Comment from Microorganisms reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
This manuscript is a thought-provoking addition to the literature on magnetic monopoles, obtained through symmetrizing Maxwell's equations. I offer a...
- Comment from Physics Essays reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
The reviewer suggests the authors use NMDS instead of PCA, as NMDS is more common than PCA in the literature.
- Comment from Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and... reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
The text is also lacking a proper literature review. The library literature is replete with research on Disaster Management. The author has mentioned...
- Comment from Information Development reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
• The title is informative and relevant, but it sounds not interesting. I suggest rewriting the title to be more interesting.
- Comment from Ad Hoc Networks reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
Reviewer 1 Report In this paper, the author adopted deep learning classifier to automatically detect/classify the endangered whale calls. The whole lo...
- Comment from Sensors reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
I would counsel the author to consider less 'subjective' language in future work/research. I found myself asking 'where is the evidence? for some stat...
- Comment from Counselling and Psychotherapy Research reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
Methodology to achieve these goals is not easy to design, however authors have chosen a smart trial plots where there was a great geological variabili...
- Comment from Catena reviewer
Peer Review Champion Constructive
As the study identified different sets of factors associated with HT and Pre-HT in the two separate logistic regression models, I would suggest conduc...
- Comment from F1000 Research reviewer