The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures
Authors
Keywords
Peer review, Cooperation, Game theory, Scientist strategies, Agent-based model
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-07-09
DOI
10.1007/s11192-018-2825-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals
- (2018) Giangiacomo Bravo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure
- (2018) David Robert Grimes et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
- (2017) Rafael D’Andrea et al. PLoS One
- The miracle of peer review and development in science: an agent-based model
- (2017) Simone Righi et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times
- (2017) Emre Sarigöl et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Post retraction citations in context: a case study
- (2017) Judit Bar-Ilan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication
- (2017) Michail Kovanis et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Peer review: Troubled from the start
- (2016) Alex Csiszar NATURE
- The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
- (2016) Michail Kovanis et al. PLoS One
- Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game
- (2016) Stefano Balietti et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science?
- (2015) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Will technology trample peer review in ecology? Ongoing issues and potential solutions
- (2015) Pedro R. Peres-Neto OIKOS
- Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists
- (2014) Joeri K. Tijdink et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism
- (2014) Mario Paolucci et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The principal-agent problem in peer review
- (2014) Jose A. García et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Adverse selection of reviewers
- (2014) Jose A. García et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Exit, Punishment and Rewards in Commons Dilemmas: An Experimental Study
- (2013) Giangiacomo Bravo et al. PLoS One
- Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure
- (2012) Flaminio Squazzoni et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average
- (2011) S. Thurner et al. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B
- The evolution of overconfidence
- (2011) Dominic D. P. Johnson et al. NATURE
- Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy
- (2011) Jeffrey T. Leek et al. PLoS One
- Positive assortment for peer review
- (2010) C Athena Aktipis et al. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search