The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures
出版年份 2018 全文链接
标题
The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures
作者
关键词
Peer review, Cooperation, Game theory, Scientist strategies, Agent-based model
出版物
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Nature
发表日期
2018-07-09
DOI
10.1007/s11192-018-2825-4
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Hidden connections: Network effects on editorial decisions in four computer science journals
- (2018) Giangiacomo Bravo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure
- (2018) David Robert Grimes et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?
- (2017) Rafael D’Andrea et al. PLoS One
- The miracle of peer review and development in science: an agent-based model
- (2017) Simone Righi et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Quantifying the effect of editor–author relations on manuscript handling times
- (2017) Emre Sarigöl et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Post retraction citations in context: a case study
- (2017) Judit Bar-Ilan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication
- (2017) Michail Kovanis et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Peer review: Troubled from the start
- (2016) Alex Csiszar NATURE
- The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
- (2016) Michail Kovanis et al. PLoS One
- Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game
- (2016) Stefano Balietti et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science?
- (2015) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Will technology trample peer review in ecology? Ongoing issues and potential solutions
- (2015) Pedro R. Peres-Neto OIKOS
- Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists
- (2014) Joeri K. Tijdink et al. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
- Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism
- (2014) Mario Paolucci et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The principal-agent problem in peer review
- (2014) Jose A. García et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Adverse selection of reviewers
- (2014) Jose A. García et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Exit, Punishment and Rewards in Commons Dilemmas: An Experimental Study
- (2013) Giangiacomo Bravo et al. PLoS One
- Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure
- (2012) Flaminio Squazzoni et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average
- (2011) S. Thurner et al. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B
- The evolution of overconfidence
- (2011) Dominic D. P. Johnson et al. NATURE
- Cooperation between Referees and Authors Increases Peer Review Accuracy
- (2011) Jeffrey T. Leek et al. PLoS One
- Positive assortment for peer review
- (2010) C Athena Aktipis et al. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
- (2010) Daniele Fanelli PLoS One
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started