Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure

P values and the search for significance

(2017) Naomi Altman et al.   NATURE METHODS

Fostering reproducible fMRI research

(2017)   NATURE NEUROSCIENCE

Meta-assessment of bias in science

(2017) Daniele Fanelli et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Evolution of ReportingPValues in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015

(2016) David Chavalarias et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility

(2016) Monya Baker   NATURE

Correction: On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs

(2016) David Robert Grimes   PLoS One

The natural selection of bad science

(2016) Paul E. Smaldino et al.   Royal Society Open Science

The fickle P value generates irreproducible results

(2015) Lewis G Halsey et al.   NATURE METHODS

Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications

(2015) Maarten van Wesel   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references

(2015) Lutz Bornmann et al.   Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature

(2015) Michał Krawczyk   PLoS One

Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery

(2015) Richard McElreath et al.   PLoS One

Publication metrics and success on the academic job market

(2014) David van Dijk et al.   CURRENT BIOLOGY

Assessing Value in Biomedical Research

(2014) John P. A. Ioannidis et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management

(2014) Rustam Al-Shahi Salman et al.   LANCET

Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer

(2014) A. Franco et al.   SCIENCE

How to Make More Published Research True

(2014) John P. A. Ioannidis   PLOS MEDICINE

An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values

(2014) D. Colquhoun   Royal Society Open Science

Publication Pressure and Burn Out among Dutch Medical Professors: A Nationwide Survey

(2013) Joeri K. Tijdink et al.   PLoS One

Raise standards for preclinical cancer research

(2012) C. Glenn Begley et al.   NATURE

Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem's ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall’ Effect

(2012) Stuart J. Ritchie et al.   PLoS One

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

(2012) F. C. Fang et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Magnitude of effects in clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals

(2011) Konstantinos CM Siontis et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

State of denial

(2010) Megan Scudellari   NATURE MEDICINE

Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data

(2010) Daniele Fanelli   PLoS One

Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction

(2010) M. A. G. van der Heyden et al.   Netherlands Heart Journal

How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

(2009) Daniele Fanelli   PLoS One

Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity

(2008) Stefania I. Papatheodorou et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Publish or perish, but at what cost?

(2008) Ushma S. Neill   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION